Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30277575›Full record

ReviewCancer2018

Moving beyond static survivorship care plans: A systems engineering approach to population health management for cancer survivors.

Amye J Tevaarwerk, Jennifer R Klemp, Gijsberta J van Londen, Bradford W Hesse, Mary E Sesto

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Developing the multidisciplinary and multispecialty workforce and the systems needed to sustain high-quality care from diagnosis through long-term survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Identifying Patients with Breast Cancer History Using Epic Electronic Health Record.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Riding the Wave of Digital Transformation in Behavioral Medicine.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Role of the Internet in Solving the Last Mile Problem in Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amye J TevaarwerkDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison and Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-8087-5119
Jennifer R KlempDepartment of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center and University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Gijsberta J van LondenUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and School/Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bradford W HesseDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mary E SestoDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison and Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USNational Cancer Institute · USThe University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
PLANNING AND EVALUATIONP20CA103697 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WEINDRUCH, RICHARD · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
CDC HHS CDC15-1501NCI NIH HHS 5P30 CAO47904NCI NIH HHS P20 CA103697NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American cancer survivor population is ever-growing, with necessary follow-up primarily accomplished in a high-touch fashion-adding to unsustainability and fragmentation of care. Given the complexities of the health care system processes needed to support survivorship, engineering approaches may best address performance deficits and facilitate the provision of patient-centered care. Such collaboration between health care and engineering is recommended for redesigning health care delivery systems. By using Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS), a systems engineering model widely used to improve health care quality and delivery, the authors examine the work system to identify the barriers and facilitators to necessary care in the presence of a survivorship care plan and visit. Recommendations for future improvement include ensuring that care-planning processes are dynamic, clearly assigned, resilient, and integrated with electronic health record systems.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsPopulation Health ManagementHumansPatient-Centered CareSurvivorshipcancer survivorshipcare planninghuman factors engineeringpopulation health managementsurvivorship care plans (SCPs)Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS)

Identifiers

PMID30277575
PMCPMC6388615
OpenAlexW2891646545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.