Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30277185›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations.

SeeHoe Ng, Boyd Swinburn, Bridget Kelly, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Heather Yeatman, Mohd Noor Ismail, Tilakavati Karupaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Policy Inertia on Regulating Food Marketing to Children: A Case Study of Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

SeeHoe Ng1Early Start,School of Health and Society,University of Wollongong,Wollongong,NSW,Australia.
Boyd Swinburn2School of Population Health,University of Auckland,Auckland,New Zealand.
Bridget Kelly1Early Start,School of Health and Society,University of Wollongong,Wollongong,NSW,Australia.
Stefanie Vandevijvere2School of Population Health,University of Auckland,Auckland,New Zealand.
Heather Yeatman1Early Start,School of Health and Society,University of Wollongong,Wollongong,NSW,Australia.
Mohd Noor Ismail3Faculty of Hospitality,Food and Leisure Management,Taylor's University,Selangor,Malaysia.
Tilakavati Karupaiah4Dietetics Program,School of Healthcare Sciences,Faculty of Health Sciences,Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,50300Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps.

designThe Healthy Food-Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) comprises forty-seven indicators of government policy practice. Local evidence of each indicator was compiled from government institutions and verified by related government stakeholders. The extent of implementation of the policies was rated by experts against international best practices. Rating results were used to identify and propose policy actions which were subsequently prioritised by the experts based on 'importance' and 'achievability' criteria. The policy actions with relatively higher 'achievability' and 'importance' were set as priority recommendations for government action.

settingMalaysia. SUBJECTS: Twenty-six local experts.

resultsMajority (62 %) of indicators was rated 'low' implementation with no indicator rated as either 'high' or 'very little, if any' in terms of implementation. The top five recommendations were (i) restrict unhealthy food marketing in children's settings and (ii) on broadcast media; (iii) mandatory nutrition labelling for added sugars; (iv) designation of priority research areas related to obesity prevention and diet-related non-communicable diseases; and (v) introduce energy labelling on menu boards for fast-food outlets.

conclusionsThis first policy study conducted in Malaysia identified a number of gaps in implementation of key policies to promote healthy food environments, compared with international best practices. Study findings could strengthen civil society advocacies for government accountability to create a healthier food environment.

Indexed as

GovernmentHealth PrioritiesNutrition PolicyPublic HealthEnvironmentFast FoodsFood IndustryFood LabelingFood QualityFood ServicesFood SupplyHealth PromotionHumansMalaysiaMarketingMass MediaFood environmentNon-communicable diseasesObesityPolicyUpper-middle-income country

Identifiers

PMID30277185
PMCPMC10260876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.