ArticleHuman brain mapping2019
Neural correlates of time distortion in a preaction period.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From finger to whole-body movements: How movement type affects our sense of time.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Article
- Temporal perceptual learning distinguishes between empty and filled intervals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Moderate physical activity alters the estimation of time, but not space.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- How movements shape the perception of time.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
- Neural dynamics of racial categorization predicts racial bias in face recognition and altruism.Nature human behaviour · 2020Article
- Neural correlates of time distortion in a preaction period.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An intention to move distorts the perception of time. For example, a visual stimulus presented during the preparation of manual movements is perceived longer than actual. Although neural mechanisms underlying this action-induced time distortion have been unclear, here we propose a new model in which the distortion is caused by a sensory-motor interaction mediated by alpha rhythm. It is generally known that viewing a stimulus induces a reduction in amplitude of occipital 10-Hz wave ("alpha-blocking"). Preparing manual movements are also known to reduce alpha power in the motor cortex ("mu-suppression"). When human participants prepared movements while viewing a stimulus, we found that those two types of classical alpha suppression interacted in the third (time-processing) region in the brain, inducing a prominent decrease in alpha power in the supplementary motor cortex (SMA). Interestingly, this alpha suppression in the SMA occurred in an asymmetric manner (such that troughs of alpha rhythm was more strongly suppressed than peaks), which can produce a gradual increase (slow shift of baseline) in neural activity. Since the neural processing in the SMA encodes a subjective time length for a sensory event, the increased activity in this region (by the asymmetric alpha suppression) would cause an overestimation of elapsed time, resulting in the action-induced time distortion. Those results showed a unique role of alpha wave enabling communications across distant (visual, motor, and time-processing) regions in the brain and further suggested a new type of sensory-motor interaction based on neural desynchronization (rather than synchronization).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.