ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2019
Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Correlation Between Infant Head Shape in Craniometric Studies and Psychomotor Development Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Investigating the Prevalence of Neurological Soft Signs in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and their Siblings: A Cross-Sectional Study.Iranian journal of child neurology · 2025Article
- Motor development in infants with complex congenital heart disease: A longitudinal study.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Article
- Psychometric properties of the Infant Motor Profile (IMP): A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2022Article
- Intelligent wearable allows out-of-the-lab tracking of developing motor abilities in infants.Communications medicine · 2022Article
- The developing brain: Challenges and opportunities to promote school readiness in young children at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Co-Design of a Neurodevelopment Assessment Scale: A Study Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Early Diagnostics and Early Intervention in Neurodevelopmental Disorders-Age-Dependent Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Atypical general movements in the general population: Prevalence over the last 15 years and associated factors.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2020Article
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at 2-3 Years of Age.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Prevailing head position to one side in early infancy-A population-based study.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2020Observational
- Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment developmental and socio-emotional scales: reliability and predictive value in an at-risk population.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess reliability and predictive validity of the neurological scale of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA), a recently developed assessment for infants aged 6 weeks to 12 months.
methodTo assess reliability, three assessors independently rated video-recorded neurological assessments of 24 infants twice. Item difficulty and discrimination were determined. To evaluate predictive validity, 181 infants (median gestational age 30wks [range 22-41wks]; 92 males, 89 females) attending a non-academic outpatient clinic were assessed with SINDA's neurological scale (28 dichotomized items). Atypical neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months or older corrected age implied a Bayley Mental Developmental Index or Psychomotor Developmental Index lower than 70 or a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP). Predictive values were calculated from SINDA (2-12mo corrected age, median 3mo) and typical versus atypical outcome.
resultsIntraclass correlation coefficients of intrarater and interrater agreement of the neurological score varied between 0.923 and 0.965. Item difficulty and discrimination were satisfactory. At 24 months or older, 56 children (31%) had an atypical outcome (29 had CP). Atypical neurological scores (below 25th centile, ≤21) predicted atypical outcome and CP with sensitivities of 89% and 100%, and specificities of 94% and 81% respectively.
interpretationSINDA's neurological scale is reliable and in a non-academic outpatient setting has a satisfactory predictive validity for atypical developmental outcome, including CP, at 24 months or older. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment's neurological scale has a good to excellent reliability. The scale has promising predictive validity for cerebral palsy. The scale has promising predictive validity for other types of atypical developmental outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.