ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019
[From volunteer work to critical care paramedic : The history of an ongoing process of professionalisation].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor 4 years, the profession of critical care paramedic has been established in Germany. As a result, nonmedical rescue service personnel receive a 3-year apprenticeship for the first time. This also led to a revaluation of functions and responsibilities within this occupational field.
objectivesWhich medical and social processes contributed to the establishment of the occupational profile of a critical care paramedic? How did training methods change over the last 50 years and which debates helped to shape the development of the occupational field? MATERIALS AND
methodsThe article at hand is based on an interpretation of archival primary sources of the parties observed. Moreover, it is also predicated on a qualitative content analyses of the secondary literature focusing on the subject area of nonmedical rescue service personnel.
resultsIn the 1960s, a professionalisation process for paramedics was initiated after realising that rapid medical treatment on location can have a positive impact on the healing process. The debate on the training for paramedics has been influenced by longstanding negotiations between different parties about the question of which tasks could be ascribed to nonmedical rescue service personnel.
conclusionsIn the larger context, the discussions about the tasks of critical care paramedics are centered around the question of delegation and, respectively, the substitution of medical tasks usually assigned to physicians. The academization of the profession that is currently emerging will continue to lead to conflicts with the medical profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30276564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.