Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276513›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2019

VOC sources and exposures in nail salons: a pilot study in Michigan, USA.

Lexuan Zhong, Stuart Batterman, Chad W Milando

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Health Risk Assessment of Nail Technicians in the Formal and Informal Sectors of Johannesburg, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lexuan ZhongMechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-8826
Stuart BattermanSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. stuartb@umich.edu.
Chad W MilandoSchool of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455NIOSH CDC HHS T42OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExposures of nail salon technicians have received attention due to the potentially toxic materials used in nail products, which include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as formaldehyde and methyl methacrylate (MMA). This study characterized area and personal concentrations and other indoor air parameters in 17 nail salons in fall and winter seasons in three areas of Michigan.

methodsVOC samples were analyzed using thermal desorption, gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy, and the VOC composition of 35 nail products (e.g., polish, top coat, base coat) was measured using headspace sampling. Ventilation rates were derived using CO

resultsWe detected ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, butyl acetate, MMA, n-heptane and toluene in most salons, and benzene, D-limonene, formaldehyde, and ethyl methacrylate in some salons. While MMA was not measured in the consumer and professional products, and the use of pure MMA in salons has been not been permitted since the 1970s, MMA was found in air at concentrations from 100 to 36,000 µg/m

conclusionThis study identifies the products responsible for emissions, shows the widespread presence of MMA, and documents low ventilation rates in some salons. It also demonstrates that "informal" short-term sampling approaches can evaluate chemical exposures in nail salons, providing measurements that can be used to protect a potentially susceptible and vulnerable population. Additional controls, including restrictions on the VOC compositions and improved ventilation, can reduce exposures to salon workers and clients.

Indexed as

VentilationAir Pollutants, OccupationalAir Pollution, IndoorCarbon DioxideCosmeticsFormaldehydeHumansMethylmethacrylatesMichiganOccupational ExposurePilot ProjectsSeasonsVolatile Organic CompoundsAir Pollutants, OccupationalCarbon DioxideCosmeticsFormaldehydeMethylmethacrylatesVolatile Organic CompoundsChemical exposuresIndoor air quality (IAQ)Methyl methacrylate (MMA)Occupational healthVentilation

Identifiers

PMID30276513
PMCPMC6325001
OpenAlexW2894600264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.