Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276502›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2018

Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.

Phillip S Hudson, Kyungreem Han, H Lee Woodcock, Bernard R Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantum-Centric Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  2. Free energies at QM accuracy from force fields via multimap targeted estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phillip S HudsonLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20852, USA. phillip.hudson@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-1856-1135
Kyungreem HanLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20852, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2290-4858
H Lee WoodcockDepartment of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 33620, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3539-273X
Bernard R BrooksDepartment of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, 33620, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3586-2730

Funding

Development Of Theoretical Methods For Studying Biological MacromoleculesZIAHL001051 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BROOKS, BERNARD R · 2009 to 2025
$16.2M
Design and application ofrobust and efficient QM/MM free energy simulation methods for biomolecular systemsR01GM129519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI WOODCOCK III, HENRY LEE · 2018 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) methods in binding free energy calculations, particularly in the SAMPL challenge, often fail to achieve improvement over standard additive (MM) force fields. Frequently, the implementation is through use of reference potentials, or the so-called "indirect approach", and inherently relies on sufficient overlap existing between MM and QM/MM configurational spaces. This overlap is generally poor, particularly for the use of free energy perturbation to perform the MM to QM/MM free energy correction at the end states of interest (e.g., bound and unbound states). However, by utilizing MM parameters that best reproduce forces obtained at the desired QM level of theory, it is possible to lessen the configurational disparity between MM and QM/MM. To this end, we sought to use force matching to generate MM parameters for the SAMPL6 CB[8] host-guest binding challenge, classically compute binding free energies, and apply energetic end state corrections to obtain QM/MM binding free energy differences. For the standard set of 11 molecules and the bonus set (including three additional challenge molecules), error statistics, such as the root mean square deviation (RMSE) were moderately poor (5.5 and 5.4 kcal/mol). Correlation statistics, however, were in the top two for both standard and bonus set submissions ([Formula: see text] of 0.42 and 0.26, [Formula: see text] of 0.64 and 0.47 respectively). High RMSE and moderate correlation strongly indicated the presence of systematic error. Identifiable issues were ameliorated for two of the guest molecules, resulting in a reduction of error and pointing to strong prospects for the future use of this methodology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCucurbit(n)urilsLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsMolecular StructurePhysical PhenomenaProtein BindingProteinsQuantum TheorySoftwareSolventsThermodynamicsWaterCucurbit(n)urilsLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsProteinsSolventsWaterForce matchingHost–guestIndirect free energySAMPL6

Identifiers

PMID30276502
PMCPMC6867086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.