ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2018
Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantum-Centric Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Free energies at QM accuracy from force fields via multimap targeted estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Exploring Routes to Enhance the Calculation of Free Energy Differences via Non-Equilibrium Work SQM/MM Switching Simulations Using Hybrid Charge Intermediates between MM and SQM Levels of Theory or Non-Linear Switching Schemes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021Article
- SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021Article
- Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- Multi-phase Boltzmann weighting: accounting for local inhomogeneity in molecular simulations of water-octanol partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
- The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
- Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett's Acceptance Ratio Methods.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Use of quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) methods in binding free energy calculations, particularly in the SAMPL challenge, often fail to achieve improvement over standard additive (MM) force fields. Frequently, the implementation is through use of reference potentials, or the so-called "indirect approach", and inherently relies on sufficient overlap existing between MM and QM/MM configurational spaces. This overlap is generally poor, particularly for the use of free energy perturbation to perform the MM to QM/MM free energy correction at the end states of interest (e.g., bound and unbound states). However, by utilizing MM parameters that best reproduce forces obtained at the desired QM level of theory, it is possible to lessen the configurational disparity between MM and QM/MM. To this end, we sought to use force matching to generate MM parameters for the SAMPL6 CB[8] host-guest binding challenge, classically compute binding free energies, and apply energetic end state corrections to obtain QM/MM binding free energy differences. For the standard set of 11 molecules and the bonus set (including three additional challenge molecules), error statistics, such as the root mean square deviation (RMSE) were moderately poor (5.5 and 5.4 kcal/mol). Correlation statistics, however, were in the top two for both standard and bonus set submissions ([Formula: see text] of 0.42 and 0.26, [Formula: see text] of 0.64 and 0.47 respectively). High RMSE and moderate correlation strongly indicated the presence of systematic error. Identifiable issues were ameliorated for two of the guest molecules, resulting in a reduction of error and pointing to strong prospects for the future use of this methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.