Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276500›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2018

Early onset of efficacy with erenumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

Todd Schwedt, Uwe Reuter, Stewart Tepper, Messoud Ashina, David Kudrow, Gregor Broessner, Guy P Boudreau, Peter McAllister, Thuy Vu, Feng Zhang and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Todd SchwedtDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA. Schwedt.Todd@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7780-7086
Uwe ReuterDepartment of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stewart TepperGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Messoud AshinaDanish Headache Center and Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David KudrowCalifornia Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Gregor BroessnerDepartment of Neurology, Headache Outpatient Clinic, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Guy P BoudreauClinique de la Migraine et Céphalées, Département de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Peter McAllisterNew England Institute for Neurology & Headache, Stamford, CT, USA.
Thuy VuAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Feng ZhangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Sunfa ChengAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Hernan PicardAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Shihua WenNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Joseph KahnNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Jan KlattNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel MikolAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Funding

Amgen (US) naNovartis Pharma AG na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubcutaneous erenumab reduced monthly migraine days and increased the likelihood of achieving a ≥ 50% reduction at all monthly assessment points tested in 2 pivotal trials in episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). Early efficacy of migraine preventive medications is an important treatment characteristic to patients. Delays in achievement of efficacy can result in failed adherence. The objective of these post-hoc analyses were to evaluate efficacy in the first 4 weeks after initial subcutaneous administration of erenumab 70 mg, erenumab 140 mg, or placebo.

methodsThere is no generally accepted methodology to measure onset of action for migraine preventive medications. We used a comprehensive approach with data from both studies to evaluate change from baseline in weekly migraine days (WMD), achievement of ≥ 50% reduction in WMD, and proportion of patients experiencing migraine measured on a daily basis. The 7-day moving averages were overlaid with observed data.

resultsIn both studies (EM: N = 955; CM: N = 667), there was evidence of onset of efficacy of erenumab vs. placebo during the first week of treatment, which in some cases reached nominal significance. For EM the changes in WMD were (least squares mean [LSM] [95% CI]): placebo, - 0.1 (- 0.3, 0.0); erenumab 70 mg, - 0.3 (- 0.5, - 0.2) p = 0.130; erenumab 140 mg, - 0.6 (- 0.7, - 0.4) p < 0.001. For CM the changes were: placebo, - 0.5 (- 0.8, - 0.3); erenumab 70 mg, - 0.9 (- 1.2, - 0.7) p = 0.047; erenumab 140 mg, - 0.8 (- 1.1, - 0.5) p = 0.18. Achievement of ≥ 50% reduction in WMD was observed as early as Week 1 (adjusted OR [95% CI] erenumab vs placebo) in EM: erenumab 70 mg, 1.3 (1.0, 1.9) p = 0.097; erenumab 140 mg, 2.0 (1.4, 2.7) p < 0.001. A similar outcome was observed for CM: erenumab 70 mg, 1.8 (1.1, 2.8) p = 0.011; erenumab 140 mg, 1.9 (1.2, 2.9) p = 0.009. Seven-day moving averages of observed data showed each treatment arm differed from placebo by Week 1 (OR [95% CI]): in EM Day 3 for erenumab 140 mg, 0.7 (0.5, 1.0) p = 0.031 and at Day 7 for 70 mg, 0.6 (0.4, 0.8) p = 0.002; in CM: Day 6 for erenumab 70 mg, 0.6 (0.4, 0.9) p = 0.022 and at Day 7 for 140 mg, 0.7 (0.4, 1.0); p = 0.038.

conclusionErenumab showed early onset of efficacy with separation from placebo within the first week of treatment in both chronic and episodic migraine patients.

Indexed as

InternationalityAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizederenumabChronic migraineEfficacyEpisodic migraineErenumabMigraine preventive clinical trialMigraine preventive medicationOnset of efficacy

Identifiers

PMID30276500
PMCPMC6755616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.