Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276481›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2018

The biotechnological potential of anaerobic fungi on fiber degradation and methane production.

Yanfen Cheng, Qicheng Shi, Ruolin Sun, Dong Liang, Yuanfei Li, Yuqi Li, Wei Jin, Weiyun Zhu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of FermentedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Dietary Fermentation withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rumen Microbiome Reveals the Differential Response of COAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Hydrogenosome, Pairing Anaerobic Fungi and HJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanfen ChengLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-9551
Qicheng ShiLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Ruolin SunLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Dong LiangLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yuanfei LiLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yuqi LiLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Wei JinLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Weiyun ZhuLaboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. zhuweiyun@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities KYDK201701National Natural Science Foundation of China 31772627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobic fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota), an early branching family of fungi, are commonly encountered in the digestive tract of mammalian herbivores. To date, isolates from ten described genera have been reported, and several novel taxonomic groupings are detected using culture-independent molecular methods. Anaerobic fungi are recognized as playing key roles in the decomposition of lignocellulose (up to 50% of the ingested and untreated lignocellulose), with their physical penetration and extracellular enzymatical secretion of an unbiased diverse repertoire of cell-wall-degrading enzymes. The secreted cell-wall-degrading enzymes of anaerobic fungi include both free enzymes and extracellular multi-enzyme complexes called cellulosomes, both of which have potential as fiber degraders in industries. In addition, anaerobic fungi can provide large amounts of substrates such as hydrogen, formate, and acetate for their co-cultured methanogens. Consequently, large amounts of methane can be produced. And thus, it is promising to use the co-culture of anaerobic fungi and methanogens in the biogas process to intensify the biogas yield owing to the efficient and robust degradation of recalcitrant biomass by anaerobic fungi and improved methane production from co-cultures of anaerobic fungi and methanogens.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBiotechnologyFermentationAcetic AcidAnaerobiosisBiofuelsBiomassCellulaseCellulosomesCoculture TechniquesCotton FiberEuryarchaeotaFormatesFungiHydrogenLigninAcetic AcidBiofuelsCellulaseFormatesformic acidhemicelluloseHydrogenLigninlignocelluloseMethanePolysaccharidesAnaerobic fungiFiber-degrading enzymesLignocelluloseMethane

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.