ArticleHerz2020
Long-term vitamin-K antagonist use and coronary artery calcification.
Article in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin K antagonists and cardiovascular calcification: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy on coronary artery calcification (CAC) by comparing long-term VKA users with metallic prosthetic valves (MPVs) and VKA-free patients undergoing coronary calcium scoring for cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification.
methodsA total of 108 patients (43 VKA users with MPV and 65 gender-, age-, and risk-factor-matched VKA-free patients) were included in the study. CAC was determined via computed tomography (CT) and quantified on the basis of the Agatston score. The VKA group comprised patients who had an MPV for longer than 5 years, which entailed long-term VKA use.
resultsLong-term VKA users had more calcified coronary arteries compared with the control group (178.1 ± 278 vs. 61.1 ± 130.6, p = 0.01). There was no difference between groups in terms of traditional CV risk factors. The mean duration of VKA use was 15 ± 7 years for the patients with MPV. There was no correlation between the duration of VKA use and mean Agatston score (r = 0.2, p = 0.215).
conclusionWith its unique selection of patient groups, our study extends the findings of previous research that long-term VKA use is related to CAC as detected via CT scanning. The longer and more potent VKA regimen required for MPV patients is the primary cause of CAC in this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.