Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276441›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2019

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS

Donald E Low, William Allum, Giovanni De Manzoni, Lorenzo Ferri, Arul Immanuel, MadhanKumar Kuppusamy, Simon Law, Mats Lindblad, Nick Maynard, Joseph Neal and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 303 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
303citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
45.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03798951 naterminatednot on this map

Evaluation of a Multimodal Program of Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy Within an ERAS Pathway

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità Vita-Salute San RaffaeleRan2019 to 2024Enrolled21ConditionsEsophageal Cancer SurgeryArmsPrehabilitation
NCT06563557 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

ERASME ULB: Erasme Randomized Controlled Trial Surveys Hemodynamic Excursions During Esophagectomy - a Double Blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled75ConditionsEsophagectomy, Epidural, Anesthesia, Paravertebral AnesthesiaArmsHemodynamic changes between epidural and paravertebral during esophagectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

303 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 574 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Evaluating the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols following oesophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. PERIOPERATIVE CARE IN DIGESTIVE SURGERY: THE ERAS AND ACERTO PROTOCOLS - BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY POSITION PAPER.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Guideline
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Trial

243 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Donald E LowHead of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, C6-GS, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. donald.low@vmmc.org.
William AllumThe Royal Marsden Hospitals, London, UK.
Giovanni De ManzoniUniversity of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lorenzo FerriMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Arul ImmanuelNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
MadhanKumar KuppusamyHead of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, C6-GS, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Simon LawQueen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Mats LindbladKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nick MaynardOxford Radcliffe Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Joseph NealHead of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, C6-GS, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
C S PrameshTata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Mike ScottVirginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
B Mark SmithersPrincess Alexandra Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Valérie AddorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olle LjungqvistÖrebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Virginia Mason Medical Center · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEMcGill University Health Centre · CANewcastle upon Tyne Hospital · GBÖrebro University · SEPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQueen Mary Hospital · CNRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBTata Memorial Hospital · INUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Verona · ITVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure.

methodsA team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system.

resultsThirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure.

conclusionsThe current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicEnteral NutritionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPerioperative CareRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID30276441
OpenAlexW2894674184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.