Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276437›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

Andreas B Imhoff, Matthias J Feucht, Eva Bartsch, Matthias Cotic, Jonas Pogorzelski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [Patellofemoral joint replacement: onlay or inlay?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. imhoff@tum.de.
Matthias J FeuchtDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Eva BartschDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Matthias CoticDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Jonas PogorzelskiDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes and survivorship at 2 and 5 years after isolated contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

methodsThirty-four patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Kellgren-Lawrence grading was used to assess the progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and the Caton-Deschamps Index to determine patellar height. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to investigate the implant survivorship. Preoperative patient characteristics were compared among failures and success to determine potential risk factors and patient satisfaction was rated postoperatively.

resultsFive of the 34 patients were lost to follow-up resulting in a final follow-up rate of 86%. The total WOMAC subscores of pain and function and the VAS Pain improved significantly at 2- and 5-years, with no significant difference between the two time points. The WOMAC stiffness subscale reached significant improvement at 2-year follow-up alone. No significant progressions of tibiofemoral arthritis or changes in patellar height were observed. A total of six patients (17.1%) failed leaving a survival rate of 91% after 2 years and 83% after 5 years. The main cause for postoperative failure was persistent knee pain; however, no significant preoperative risk factor in patient characteristics could be identified.

conclusionPatellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up with no radiographic progression of tibiofemoral OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level III.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthroplastyArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainPatellaPatellofemoral JointPatient SatisfactionInlayKneePatellofemoralPatellofemoral arthroplastyPatellofemoral osteoarthritisPatellofemoral resurfacingRetropatellar resurfacingTrochleaWAVE prosthesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.