Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276428›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018

[New strategies and materials in endoscopic vacuum therapy in the lower gastrointestinal tract].

M Kantowski, A Kunze

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Learning of flexible endoscopy, particularly endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT).Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Learning of flexible endoscopy, particularly endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT)].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M KantowskiUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik für Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. m.kantowski@uke.de.
A KunzeKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic vacuum therapy is a widespread method in the postoperative treatment of lower and upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract leakage.

objectiveThere is an absence of further technical development of the standardized material from 2007 for the lower GI tract. MATERIAL AND

methodsNew strategies and new materials for endoscopic vacuum therapy are presented.

resultsAlternative strategies in sponge placement, use of open-pore film drainage, use of a multiple sponge system, rinsing catheter, electronic pumps etc. enable the successful treatment of very complex pelvic defects.

conclusionThe wide variability of pelvic defects often necessitates a change in therapeutic strategies during the course of treatment for an optimized outcome.

Indexed as

EndoscopyNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyUpper Gastrointestinal TractAnastomotic LeakLower Gastrointestinal TractVacuumAnastomotic leakageMultiple sponge systemOpen-pore filmPostoperative leakageSponge application

Identifiers

PMID30276428
OpenAlexW2894908943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.