Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276172›Full record

ReviewJournal of exercise rehabilitation2018

Brief ideas about evidence-based recovery in team sports.

Julio Calleja-González, Juan Mielgo-Ayuso, Jaime Sampaio, Anne Delextrat, Sergej M Ostojic, Diego Marques-Jiménez, Iñaki Arratibel, Braulio Sánchez-Ureña, Gregory Dupont, Xavi Schelling and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Detection of Upper Limb Asymmetries in Athletes According to the Stage of the Season-A Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Julio Calleja-GonzálezDepartment of Physical Activity and Sports, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2575-7168
Juan Mielgo-AyusoEuropean University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime SampaioResearch Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), CreativeLab Research Community, Vila Real, Portugal.
Anne DelextratSport and Health Sciences Department, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Sergej M OstojicUniversity of Belgrade School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Diego Marques-JiménezDepartment of Physical Activity and Sports, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria, Spain.
Iñaki ArratibelDepartment of Physical Activity and Sports, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria, Spain.
Braulio Sánchez-UreñaHuman Movement and Quality Life School, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, Costa Rica.
Gregory DupontUniversité de Lille, EA 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaires Sport Santé Société, Research Department, Lille Olympique Sporting Club (LOSC), Lille, France.
Xavi SchellingComplex Systems in Sport Research Group SGR, National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Nicolás TerradosDepartment of Functional Biology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ESNational Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia · ESOxford Brookes University · GBUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ESUniversidad Nacional · CRUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance in team sports is the expression of complex, dynamic, interactive, and multidimensional processes. It is now well-established that optimum recovery after practice or match is a key factor of team sport performance. During season and tournaments, improving recovery could offer an advantage for following performance. As a consequence of the professionalization of different roles in staffs, new particular roles have been developed within the team sports physician core in order to improve recovery protocols. Presently, scientific literature presents a big amount of methods used to enhance recovery based on the type of practice, time between session or competitions and equipment and/or staff accessible. These practices, usually used by teams are related to: ergonutritional, water therapy, massages techniques, stretching compression garments, sleep strategies and psychological implements. Besides, travel fatigue has been recognized by athletes and coaches as a challenging problem that could benefit from practical solutions. Nowadays, players have to play a lot of matches without enough time to recover among them, therefore the use of well-managed recovery can lead to a competitive advantage. Although the main purpose of applied sport sciences investigation is to categorize the protocols as well as providing approaches for individual recovery, the stages to recognize the most appropriate recovery plans in the field of team sports come from the analysis of the individual parameters.

Indexed as

PerformanceRecoveryTeam sports

Identifiers

PMID30276172
PMCPMC6165975
OpenAlexW2888306727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.