Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30276000›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2018

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastric Cancer Patients Improves Clinical Outcomes at a US Cancer Center.

Jacopo Desiderio, Camille L Stewart, Virginia Sun, Laleh Melstrom, Susanne Warner, Byrne Lee, Hans F Schoellhammer, Vijay Trisal, Benjamin Paz, Yuman Fong and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lessons learned from 150 total gastrectomies for prevention of cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacopo DesiderioDepartment of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.
Camille L StewartDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Virginia SunDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Laleh MelstromDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Susanne WarnerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Byrne LeeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Hans F SchoellhammerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Vijay TrisalDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Benjamin PazDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Yuman FongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Yanghee WooDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-0593
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for gastric cancer patients have shown improved outcomes in Asia. However, data on gastric cancer ERAS (GC-ERAS) programs in the United States are sparse. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes before and after implementation of an GC-ERAS protocol at a National Comprehensive Cancer Center in the United States. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe reviewed medical records of patients surgically treated for gastric cancer with curative intent from January 2012 to October 2016 and compared the GC-ERAS group (November 1, 2015-October 1, 2016) with the historical control (HC) group (January 1, 2012-October 31, 2015). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for age, sex, number of comorbidities, body mass index, stage of disease, and distal versus total gastrectomy.

resultsOf a total of 95 identified patients, matching analysis resulted in 20 and 40 patients in the GC-ERAS and HC groups, respectively. Lower rates of nasogastric tube (35% vs. 100%, P<0.001) and intraabdominal drain placement (25% vs. 85%, P<0.001), faster advancement of diet (P<0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (5.5 vs. 7.8 days, P=0.01) were observed in the GC-ERAS group than in the HC group. The GC-ERAS group showed a trend toward increased use of minimally invasive surgery (P=0.06). There were similar complication and 30-day readmission rates between the two groups (P=0.57 and P=0.66, respectively).

conclusionsThe implementation of a GC-ERAS protocol significantly improved perioperative outcomes in a western cancer center. This finding warrants further prospective investigation.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric cancerMinimally invasive surgical proceduresReturn of function

Identifiers

PMID30276000
PMCPMC6160527
OpenAlexW2885224543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.