Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30275884›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2018

Evidence of batch effects masking treatment effect in GAW20 methylation data.

Angelo J Canty, Andrew D Paterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angelo J Canty1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada.
Andrew D Paterson2Genetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 686 Bay St., Toronto, ON M5G 0A4 Canada.

Funding

Genetic and Environmental Determinants of TriglyceridesU01HL072524 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2002 to 2008
$11.9M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COMMON DISEASES: AN EVALUATIONR01GM031575 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI ALMASY, LAURA A. · 1985 to 2016
$7.8M
Epigenetic Determinants of Lipid Response to Dietary Fat and FenofibrateR01HL104135 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ARNETT, DONNA K · 2010 to 2015
$5.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104135NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL072524NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the real data set from GAW20, we examined changes in the distribution of DNA methylation before and after treatment. Paired analysis of differences in both mean and variance had grossly inflated type 1 error, suggesting either a very large number of changes across the entire epigenome or major non-biological issues, such as batch effects. Separate analysis of Infinium I and II probes indicated differences in the paired

Identifiers

PMID30275884
PMCPMC6157182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.