Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30275822›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2018

Repulsive Environment Attenuation during Adult Mouse Optic Nerve Regeneration.

Camila Oliveira Goulart, Henrique Rocha Mendonça, Julia Teixeira Oliveira, Laura Maria Savoldi, Luiza Dos Santos Heringer, Alexandre Dos Santos Rodrigues, Roberto Paes-de-Carvalho, Ana Maria Blanco Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unraveling Axon Guidance during Axotomy and Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Strategies to Promote Long-Distance Optic Nerve Regeneration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  13. Loss ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Camila Oliveira GoulartLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo, Departamento de Patologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, HUCFF, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Henrique Rocha MendonçaLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo, Departamento de Patologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, HUCFF, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Julia Teixeira OliveiraLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo, Departamento de Patologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, HUCFF, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-9369
Laura Maria SavoldiLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo, Departamento de Patologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, HUCFF, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Luiza Dos Santos HeringerLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo, Departamento de Patologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, HUCFF, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Alexandre Dos Santos RodriguesDepartamento de Neurobiologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Neurociências, UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Roberto Paes-de-CarvalhoDepartamento de Neurobiologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Neurociências, UFF, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Maria Blanco MartinezLaboratório de Neurodegeneração e Reparo, Departamento de Patologia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, HUCFF, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0821-5730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regenerative capacity of CNS tracts has ever been a great hurdle to regenerative medicine. Although recent studies have described strategies to stimulate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to regenerate axons through the optic nerve, it still remains to be elucidated how these therapies modulate the inhibitory environment of CNS. Thus, the present work investigated the environmental content of the repulsive axon guidance cues, such as Sema3D and its receptors, myelin debris, and astrogliosis, within the regenerating optic nerve of mice submitted to intraocular inflammation + cAMP combined to conditional deletion of PTEN in RGC after optic nerve crush. We show here that treatment was able to promote axonal regeneration through the optic nerve and reach visual targets at twelve weeks after injury. The Regenerating group presented reduced MBP levels, increased microglia/macrophage number, and reduced astrocyte reactivity and CSPG content following optic nerve injury. In addition, Sema3D content and its receptors are reduced in the Regenerating group. Together, our results provide, for the first time, evidence that several regenerative repulsive signals are reduced in regenerating optic nerve fibers following a combined therapy. Therefore, the treatment used made the CNS microenvironment more permissive to regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNerve CrushNerve RegenerationOptic NerveOptic Nerve InjuriesRetina

Identifiers

PMID30275822
PMCPMC6157103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.