Trial reportLeukemia2018
Sequential high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) versus standard double induction in acute myeloid leukemia-a phase 3 study.
Trial report in Leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML.Blood advances · 2019Trial
- Differential prognostic impact of myelodysplasia-related gene mutations in a European cohort of 4978 intensively treated AML patients.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality of life and life satisfaction in long-term survivors of acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Clonal hematopoiesis in AML long-term survivors: Risk factors and clinical consequences.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Histamine dihydrochloride and low-dose interleukin-2 has anti-leukemic efficacy in <i>NPM1</i>-mutated and myelomonocytic/monocytic acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2024Article
- Friday Leukemia-a Structural Phenomenon.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Article
- Improving long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy for patients with AML.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Article
- Validation and refinement of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2023Article
- Unsupervised meta-clustering identifies risk clusters in acute myeloid leukemia based on clinical and genetic profiles.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutational subgroups in AML patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of eleven induction chemotherapy regimens for young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a network meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Prediction of life-threatening and disabling bleeding in patients with AML receiving intensive induction chemotherapy.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Clinical and molecular relevance of genetic variants in the non-coding transcriptome of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2022Article
- Differential impact of IDH1/2 mutational subclasses on outcome in adult AML: results from a large multicenter study.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Deep learning detects acute myeloid leukemia and predicts NPM1 mutation status from bone marrow smears.Leukemia · 2022Article
- Fusion gene detection by RNA-sequencing complements diagnostics of acute myeloid leukemia and identifies recurringHaematologica · 2022Article
- A clinically applicable gene expression-based score predicts resistance to induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Validation and refinement of the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
46 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dose-dense induction with the S-HAM regimen was compared to standard double induction therapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) between S-HAM (2nd chemotherapy cycle starting on day 8 = "dose-dense") and double induction with TAD-HAM or HAM(-HAM) (2nd cycle starting on day 21 = "standard"). 387 evaluable patients were randomly assigned to S-HAM (N = 203) and to standard double induction (N = 184). The primary endpoint overall response rate (ORR) consisting of complete remission (CR) and incomplete remission (CR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.