Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30275298›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Two are better than one: Infant language learning from video improves in the presence of peers.

Sarah Roseberry Lytle, Adrian Garcia-Sierra, Patricia K Kuhl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Birds and babies: Ontogeny of vocal learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. More Than Looks: Exploring Methods to Test Phonological Discrimination in the Sign Language Kata Kolok.Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Do Infants Really Learn Phonetic Categories?Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The emergence of emotionally modern humans: implications for language and learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Parent coaching increases conversational turns and advances infant language development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah Roseberry LytleInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; sarahr28@uw.edu.
Adrian Garcia-SierraSpeech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-8583
Patricia K KuhlInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-9742

Funding

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies show that young children learn new phonemes and words from humans significantly better than from machines. However, it is not clear why learning from video is ineffective or what might be done to improve learning from a screen. The present study, conducted with 9-month-old infants, utilized a manipulation-touch screen video-which allowed infants to control presentations of foreign-language video clips. We tested the hypothesis that infant learning from a screen would be enhanced in the presence of a peer, as opposed to learning alone. Brain measures of phonetic learning and detailed analyses of interaction during learning confirm the hypothesis that social partners enhance learning, even from screens.

Indexed as

Computer TerminalsMultimediaFemaleHumansInfantLearningMaleinfancylanguage learningphoenemic discriminationscreen mediasocial learning

Identifiers

PMID30275298
PMCPMC6176610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.