Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30275275›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2018

Technique Development for Probing RNA Structure In Vivo and Genome-Wide.

Philip C Bevilacqua, Sarah M Assmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Site-Selective Ligand Selection by Mutational Profiling for Covalent RNA Targeting.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Heterobifunctional small molecules to modulate RNA function.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. In vivo structure probing of RNA inRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Discovering riboswitches: the past and the future.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip C BevilacquaDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.ORCID 0000-0001-8074-3434
Sarah M AssmannDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-1594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How organisms perceive and respond to their surroundings is one of the great questions in biology. It is clear that RNA plays key roles in sensing. Cellular and environmental cues that RNA responds to include temperature, ions, metabolites, and biopolymers. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing and in vivo chemical probing have provided unprecedented insights into RNA folding in vivo and genome-wide. Patterns of chemical reactivity have implicated control of gene expression by RNA and aided prediction of RNA structure. Central to these advances has been development of molecular biological and chemical techniques. Key advances are improvements in the quality, cost, and throughput of library preparation; availability of a wider array of chemicals for probing RNA structure in vivo; and robustness and user friendliness of data analysis. Insights from probing transcriptomes and future directions are provided.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID30275275
PMCPMC6169808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.