Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30274961›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

How Users Experience and Use an eHealth Intervention Based on Self-Regulation: Mixed-Methods Study.

Louise Poppe, Celien Van der Mispel, Geert Crombez, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Helene Schroé, Maïté Verloigne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louise PoppeResearch Group Physical Activity and Health, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9285-6962
Celien Van der MispelResearch Group Physical Activity and Health, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5252-9446
Geert CrombezGhent Health Psychology Lab, Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4744-8561
Ilse De BourdeaudhuijResearch Group Physical Activity and Health, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9969-7597
Helene SchroéResearch Group Physical Activity and Health, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8473-552X
Maïté VerloigneResearch Group Physical Activity and Health, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-3821
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundeHealth interventions show stronger effects when informed by solid behavioral change theories; for example, self-regulation models supporting people in translating vague intentions to specific actions have shown to be effective in altering health behaviors. Although these theories inform developers about which behavioral change techniques should be included, they provide limited information about how these techniques can be engagingly implemented in Web-based interventions. Considering the high levels of attrition in eHealth, investigating users' experience about the implementation of behavior change techniques might be a fruitful avenue.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to investigate how users experience the implementation of self-regulation techniques in a Web-based intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior in the general population.

methodsIn this study, 20 adults from the general population used the intervention for 5 weeks. Users' website data were explored, and semistructured interviews with each of the users were performed. A directed content analysis was performed using NVivo Software.

resultsThe techniques "providing feedback on performance," "action planning," and "prompting review of behavioral goals" were appreciated by users. However, the implementation of "barrier identification/problem solving" appeared to frustrate users; this was also reflected by the users' website data-many coping plans were of poor quality. Most users were well aware of the benefits of adopting a more active way of living and stated not to have learned novel information. However, they appreciated the provided information because it reminded them about the importance of having an active lifestyle. Furthermore, prompting users to self-monitor their behavioral change was not sufficiently stimulating to make users actually monitor their behavior.

conclusionsIteratively involving potential end users offers guidance to optimally adapt the implementation of various behavior change techniques to the target population. We recommend creating short interventions with a straightforward layout that support users in creating and evaluating specific plans for action.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleSelf-ControlTelemedicinebehavioral change theoryeHealthinterviewself-regulationusage data

Identifiers

PMID30274961
PMCPMC6231831
OpenAlexW2809873444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.