Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30274959›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2018

Physician and Pharmacist Medication Decision-Making in the Time of Electronic Health Records: Mixed-Methods Study.

Kathryn Mercer, Catherine Burns, Lisa Guirguis, Jessie Chin, Maman Joyce Dogba, Lisa Dolovich, Line Guénette, Laurie Jenkins, France Légaré, Annette McKinnon and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Shared decision-making practices and patient values in pharmacist outpatient care for rheumatic disease: A multiple correspondence analysis.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryn MercerSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-3396
Catherine BurnsCentre for Bioengineering and Biotechnology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6182-958X
Lisa GuirguisFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-4403
Jessie ChinBiomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2878-8544
Maman Joyce DogbaFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Ville de Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-525X
Lisa DolovichFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0061-6783
Line GuénettePopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Université Laval, Ville de Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-7550
Laurie JenkinsHealthcare Navigators, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-6875
France LégaréFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Ville de Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696
Annette McKinnonPatient Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-3122
Josephine McMurrayLazaridis School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-3781
Khrystine WakedSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7702-8197
Kelly A GrindrodSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-0391
University of Waterloo · CAUniversité Laval · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWilfrid Laurier University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care needs to be patient-centered, integrated, and interprofessional to help patients with complex needs manage the burden of medication-related problems. Considering the growing problem of polypharmacy, increasing attention has been paid to how and when medication-related decisions should be coordinated across multidisciplinary care teams. Improved knowledge on how integrated electronic health records (EHRs) can support interprofessional shared decision-making for medication therapy management is necessary to continue improving patient care.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to examine how physicians and pharmacists understand and communicate patient-focused medication information with each other and how this knowledge can influence the design of EHRs.

methodsThis study is part of a broader cross-Canada study between patients and health care providers around how medication-related decisions are made and communicated. We visited community pharmacies, team-based primary care clinics, and independent-practice family physician clinics throughout Ontario, Nova Scotia, Alberta, and Quebec. Research assistants conducted semistructured interviews with physicians and pharmacists. A modified version of the Multidisciplinary Framework Method was used to analyze the data.

resultsWe collected data from 19 pharmacies and 9 medical clinics and identified 6 main themes from 34 health care professionals. First, Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making was not occurring and clinicians made decisions based on their understanding of the patient. Physicians and pharmacists reported indirect Communication, incomplete Information specifically missing insight into indication and adherence, and misaligned Processes of Care that were further compounded by EHRs that are not designed to facilitate collaboration. Scope of Practice examined professional and workplace boundaries for pharmacists and physicians that were internally and externally imposed. Physicians decided on the degree of the Physician-Pharmacist Relationship, often predicated by colocation.

conclusionsWe observed limited communication and collaboration between primary care providers and pharmacists when managing medications. Pharmacists were missing key information around reason for use, and physicians required accurate information around adherence. EHRs are a potential tool to help clinicians communicate information to resolve this issue. EHRs need to be designed to facilitate interprofessional medication management so that pharmacists and physicians can move beyond task-based work toward a collaborative approach.

Indexed as

collaborationelectronic health recordsinterprofessional collaborationmedication managementshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID30274959
PMCPMC6231837
OpenAlexW2810346257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.