Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30274340›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Validation Study of Freezing of Gait (FoG) Detection and Machine-Learning-Based FoG Prediction Using Estimated Gait Characteristics with a Wearable Accelerometer.

Satyabrata Aich, Pyari Mohan Pradhan, Jinse Park, Nitin Sethi, Vemula Sai Sri Vathsa, Hee-Cheol Kim

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Wearable Online Freezing of Gait Detection and Cueing System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Satyabrata AichDepartment of Computer Engineering/Institute of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea. satyabrataaich@gmail.com.
Pyari Mohan PradhanDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, IIT Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. pmpradhan.fec@iitr.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6070-5577
Jinse ParkDepartment of Neurology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan 47392, Korea. jinsepark@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-5422
Nitin SethiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, IIT Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. nitinsethi.iitr@gmail.com.
Vemula Sai Sri VathsaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, IIT Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. srivathsaeric@gmail.com.
Hee-Cheol KimDepartment of Computer Engineering/Institute of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea. heeki@inje.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), KOREA N0000717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most common symptoms observed among most of the Parkinson's disease patients that affects movement pattern and is also related to the risk of fall, is usually termed as "freezing of gait (FoG)". To allow systematic assessment of FoG, objective quantification of gait parameters and automatic detection of FoG are needed. This will help in personalizing the treatment. In this paper, the objectives of the study are (1) quantification of gait parameters in an objective manner by using the data collected from wearable accelerometers; (2) comparison of five estimated gait parameters from the proposed algorithm with their counterparts obtained from the 3D motion capture system in terms of mean error rate and Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC); (3) automatic discrimination of FoG patients from no FoG patients using machine learning techniques. It was found that the five gait parameters have a high level of agreement with PCC ranging from 0.961 to 0.984. The mean error rate between the estimated gait parameters from accelerometer-based approach and 3D motion capture system was found to be less than 10%. The performances of the classifiers are compared on the basis of accuracy. The best result was accomplished with the SVM classifier with an accuracy of approximately 88%. The proposed approach shows enough evidence that makes it applicable in a real-life scenario where the wearable accelerometer-based system would be recommended to assess and monitor the FoG.

Indexed as

AccelerometryMachine LearningWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overGaitHumansMiddle AgedParkinson Diseasefeature extractionfreezing of gaitgait parametersmachine learningmean error ratepredictionwearable accelerometer

Identifiers

PMID30274340
PMCPMC6210779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.