Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30274320›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Study on the Classification, Causality, Preventability and Severity of Adverse Drug Reaction Using Spontaneous Reporting System in Hospitalized Patients.

Siraj Sundaran, Anjali Udayan, Keerthi Hareendranath, Basil Eliyas, Babu Ganesan, Ashik Hassan, Rajesh Subash, Vishnu Palakkal, Mohammed Saji Salahudeen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Adverse Drug Reactions in Norway: A Systematic Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siraj SundaranDevaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala 673634, India. tsirajsundaran@gmail.com.
Anjali UdayanDevaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala 673634, India. anjaliudayan1@gmail.com.
Keerthi HareendranathDevaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala 673634, India. Keerthi.h@outlook.com.
Basil EliyasDevaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala 673634, India. basileliyas4@gmail.com.
Babu GanesanDevaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala 673634, India. gbabu73@gmail.com.
Ashik HassanPVS Hospital Pvt Ltd., Calicut, Kerala 673002, India. ashik.h@outlook.com.
Rajesh SubashPVS Hospital Pvt Ltd., Calicut, Kerala 673002, India. rajesh.s@outlook.com.
Vishnu PalakkalDevaki Amma Memorial College of Pharmacy, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala 673634, India. vishnu.p@outlook.com.
Mohammed Saji SalahudeenDivision of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia. mohammed.salahudeen@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-9131-7465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital-based adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring and reporting programs intend to identify and quantify the risks associated with the use of medicines. To examine the causality, preventability and severity of ADR in a hospital setting; a prospective cohort study on spontaneous ADR reporting was conducted from December 2015 to May 2016. Incidence of ADRs, causality, type, severity and preventability were assessed using necessary assessment scales. The study included 3157 hospitalized individuals, in whom 51 ADRs were detected among 49 patients. The overall incidence of suspected ADRs was found to be 1.6%. According to the causality assessment, most of the ADRs reported were probable (

Indexed as

ADRadverse drug reactionscausalityseverityspontaneous reporting

Identifiers

PMID30274320
PMCPMC6306913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.