Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30273975›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2019

Experimental study of needle recording electrodes placed on the thyroid cartilage for neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery.

Y Zhao, C Li, D Zhang, L Zhou, X Liu, S Li, T Wang, G Dionigi, H Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Y ZhaoDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4951-9703
C LiDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.
D ZhangDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.
L ZhouDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.
X LiuDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.
S LiDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.
T WangDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.
G DionigiDivision for Endocrine and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood 'Gaetano Barresi', University Hospital G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
H SunDivision of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, Jilin Provincial Precision Medicine Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Translational Medicine on Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma, Changchun City, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeedle electrodes placed on the thyroid cartilage (TC) are an alternative to endotracheal tube (ET) electrodes for assessing recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) function during thyroid surgery. Needle electrodes placed on the TC were evaluated in an experimental porcine model.

methodsContinuous intraoperative neuromonitoring was used to record the electromyogram. Each TC side was delineated into nine areas to determine the optimal placement of the electrode, and needle electrode area, depth and orientation for optimal electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes were evaluated. RLN root locations were stimulated at four locations: vagus nerve distal to the neuromonitoring electrode, and most proximal, middle and laryngeal entry points of the nerve. A nerve retraction injury model was adapted to compare RLN monitoring by TC versus ET electrodes.

resultsAn optimal site for placement of needle electrodes was identified, and electromyograms obtained from the various needle insertion depths and orientations were similar. Latencies recorded from the TC and ET electrodes were similar. The amplitude profile of TC electrodes responded earlier to RLN injury than that of ET electrodes. Amplitude and drop to loss of signal were also registered earlier.

conclusionEMG amplitudes obtained using TC electrodes were higher, and identified RLN injury earlier than ET electrodes. Surgical relevance Needle electrodes placed on the thyroid cartilage (TC) are an alternative to endotracheal tube (ET) electrodes for assessing the function of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) in thyroid surgery. This study used an experimental porcine model to evaluate the use of needle electrodes inserted in the TC, compared with ET electrodes, for producing an electromyographic (EMG) profile of the RLN. Nine areas of the TC, with various needle insertion depths and orientations, were compared. Perichondral insertion into the avascular area of the TC was found to be safe. The EMG amplitude and latency features recorded via the TC and ET electrodes were compared, using both intermittent and continuous monitoring. Changes in EMG amplitudes in response to nerve traction injury were registered earlier with TC electrodes than with ET electrodes, and the amplitudes were higher and more stable. Latencies obtained via the TC and ET electrodes were similar. These results indicate that the development of a non-invasive monitoring electrode with improved function, easy placement and low cost is possible.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsDevice RemovalElectrodesElectromyographyFemaleIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringIntubation, IntratrachealNeedlesReaction TimeRecurrent Laryngeal NerveSwineThyroid CartilageTrachea

Identifiers

PMID30273975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.