Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30273859›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

Successful Secondary Engraftment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Patient-Derived Xenografts After Previous Failed Primary Engraftment.

Matthew C Hernandez, Lin Yang, Jennifer L Leiting, Takaaki Sugihara, John R Bergquist, Tommy Ivanics, Rondell Graham, Mark J Truty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preclinical mouse models for studying cholangiocarcinoma.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Selecting an Appropriate Experimental Animal Model for Cholangiocarcinoma Research.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew C HernandezSection of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Hernandez.matthew@mayo.edu.
Lin YangCenter for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: yang.lin@mayo.edu.
Jennifer L LeitingSection of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: leiting.jennifer@mayo.edu.
Takaaki SugiharaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905. Electronic address: Sugihara.takaaki@mayo.edu.
John R BergquistSection of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Bergquist.john@mayo.edu.
Tommy IvanicsDepartment of Surgery, Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: tommy.ivanics@gmail.com.
Rondell GrahamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: graham.rondell@mayo.edu.
Mark J TrutySection of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Division of Subspecialty General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: truty.mark@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USHenry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-derived xenografts (PDX) provide histologically accurate cancer models that recapitulate patient malignant phenotype and allow for highly correlative oncologic in-vivo downstream translational studies. Primary PDX engraftment failure has significant negative consequences on programmatic efficiency and resource utilization and is due to either no tumor growth or development of lymphoproliferative tumors. We aimed to determine if secondary engraftment of previously cryopreserved patient tumor tissues would allow salvage of PDX models that failed previous primary engraftment and increase overall engraftment efficiency.

methodsPatient hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers that failed primary engraftment were identified. Previously cryopreserved primary patient cancerous tissues were implanted into immunodeficient mice (NOD/SCID). Mice were monitored, growth metrics calculated, and secondary engraftment outcomes were recorded. Established PDX were verified and compared to original patient tissue through multiple generations by a GI pathologist.

resultsWe identified 55 patient tumors that previously failed primary engraftment: no tumor growth (n = 46, 84%) or lymphoproliferative tumor (LT) (n = 9, 16%). After secondary implantation using cryopreserved patient tissues, 29 new histologically validated PDX models were generated with an overall secondary engraftment rate of 53% for all tumor types with greatest yield in pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. Of the secondary engraftment failures (n = 26), 21 (38%) were due to no growth and 5 (9%) developed LT.

conclusionSecondary PDX engraftment using cryopreserved primary cancerous is feasible after previous failed engraftment attempts and can result in a 50% increase in overall engraftment efficiency with decreases in LT formation. This technique allows for salvage of critical patient PDX models that would otherwise not exist. SYNOPSIS: Patient-derived xenografts have many important translational applications however can be limited by engraftment failure. We demonstrate optimized methodology utilizing cryopreservation of primary tumor tissue that allows for subsequent successful secondary engraftment and creation of PDX models that failed previous primary engraftment and allowed salvage of patient PDX models that would otherwise not exist.

Identifiers

PMID30273859
PMCPMC6170258
OpenAlexW2893015633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.