Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30273699›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2018

Auditory central gain compensates for changes in cochlear output after prolonged low-level noise exposure.

Adam Sheppard, Xiaopeng Liu, Dalian Ding, Richard Salvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The rat animal model for noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam SheppardCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137 Cary Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: asheppar@buffalo.edu.
Xiaopeng LiuCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137 Cary Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Dalian DingCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137 Cary Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Richard SalviCenter for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137 Cary Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Asia University, Taiwan.

Funding

Hyperacusis and Central GainR01DC014693 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2016 to 2020
$2.3M
Synaptopathy and Neural Gain Following Low-Level Noise ExposureF31DC015933 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SHEPPARD, ADAM M · 2016 to 2017
$57k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015933NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remarkably, the central auditory system can modify the strength of its sound-evoked neural response based on prior acoustic experiences, a phenomenon referred to as central gain. Gain changes are well documented following traumatic noise exposure, but much less is known about central gain dynamics following prolonged exposure to low-level noise, a common acoustic experience in many urban and work environments. We recently reported that the neural output of the cochlea is reduced, while gain was enhanced in the inferior colliculus (IC) following a 5-week exposure to 75 dB noise. To determine if similar effects were present at even lower intensities, we exposed rats to a 65 dB noise expecting to see little to no change in the cochlea or IC. The exposure had little effect on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and did not cause any hair cell loss. However, the amplitude of the CAP, which reflects the neural output of cochlea, was depressed by 50-75%. Surprisingly, neural responses from the IC were enhanced up to 70%, mainly at frequencies within the noise exposure band. One-week post-exposure, CAP amplitudes returned to normal at frequencies within or above the exposure band, whereas responses evoked by frequencies below the exposure band were enhanced by more than 80%. In contrast, IC responses below the exposure frequency were depressed 10-20% whereas responses within the exposure frequency band were enhanced 10-20%. Thus, the central auditory system dynamically up- and down-regulates its gain to maintain supra-threshold neural responses within a narrow homeostatic range; a function that likely contributes to the prevention of sounds from being perceived as muffled or too loud.

Indexed as

NoiseAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHair Cells, AuditoryHearingInferior ColliculiOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousRats, Sprague-DawleyCentral gainCompound action potentialInferior colliculusNoise exposureOtoacoustic emissions

Identifiers

PMID30273699
PMCPMC6383362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.