ArticleNeuroscience letters2018
Auditory central gain compensates for changes in cochlear output after prolonged low-level noise exposure.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Connectivity, Neural Networks, and Resilience in Aging and Neurodegeneration.The American journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Noise exposure levels predict blood levels of the inner ear protein prestin.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Killer or helper? The mechanism underlying the role of adenylate activated kinase in sound conditioning.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2022Article
- Hearing loss and brain plasticity: the hyperactivity phenomenon.Brain structure & function · 2021Review
- Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- The association between subcortical and cortical fMRI and lifetime noise exposure in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.Neuroscience · 2019Article
- The rat animal model for noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remarkably, the central auditory system can modify the strength of its sound-evoked neural response based on prior acoustic experiences, a phenomenon referred to as central gain. Gain changes are well documented following traumatic noise exposure, but much less is known about central gain dynamics following prolonged exposure to low-level noise, a common acoustic experience in many urban and work environments. We recently reported that the neural output of the cochlea is reduced, while gain was enhanced in the inferior colliculus (IC) following a 5-week exposure to 75 dB noise. To determine if similar effects were present at even lower intensities, we exposed rats to a 65 dB noise expecting to see little to no change in the cochlea or IC. The exposure had little effect on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and did not cause any hair cell loss. However, the amplitude of the CAP, which reflects the neural output of cochlea, was depressed by 50-75%. Surprisingly, neural responses from the IC were enhanced up to 70%, mainly at frequencies within the noise exposure band. One-week post-exposure, CAP amplitudes returned to normal at frequencies within or above the exposure band, whereas responses evoked by frequencies below the exposure band were enhanced by more than 80%. In contrast, IC responses below the exposure frequency were depressed 10-20% whereas responses within the exposure frequency band were enhanced 10-20%. Thus, the central auditory system dynamically up- and down-regulates its gain to maintain supra-threshold neural responses within a narrow homeostatic range; a function that likely contributes to the prevention of sounds from being perceived as muffled or too loud.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.