Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30273390›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: Systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance.

Albert M Isaacs, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Daniel Yavin, Aaron Hockley, Tamara M Pringsheim, Nathalie Jette, Brendan Cord Lethebe, Mark Lowerison, Jarred Dronyk, Mark G Hamilton

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 107 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rate and risk factors for shunt revision in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus during a 17-year study period: a retrospective, population-based study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Albert M IsaacsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8405-2454
Jay Riva-CambrinDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Daniel YavinDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aaron HockleyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-503X
Tamara M PringsheimDivision of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nathalie JetteDivision of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brendan Cord LethebeClinical Research Unit, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mark LowerisonClinical Research Unit, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jarred DronykDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mark G HamiltonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydrocephalus is a debilitating disorder, affecting all age groups. Evaluation of its global epidemiology is required for healthcare planning and resource allocation.

objectivesTo define age-specific global prevalence and incidence of hydrocephalus.

methodsPopulation-based studies reporting prevalence of hydrocephalus were identified (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (1985-2017)). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Two authors reviewed abstracts, full text articles and abstracted data. Metanalysis and meta-regressions were used to assess associations between key variables. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Main outcome of interest was hydrocephalus prevalence among pediatric (≤ 18 years), adults (19-64 years), and elderly (≥ 65) patients. Annual hydrocephalus incidence stratified by country income level and folate fortification requirements were obtained (2003-2014) from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR).

resultsOf 2,460 abstracts, 52 met review eligibility criteria (aggregate population 171,558,651). Mean hydrocephalus prevalence was 85/100,000 [95% CI 62, 116]. The prevalence was 88/100,000 [95% CI 72, 107] in pediatrics; 11/100,000 [95% CI 5, 25] in adults; and 175/100,000 [95% CI 67, 458] in the elderly. The ICBDSR-based incidence of hydrocephalus diagnosed at birth remained stable over 11 years: 81/100,000 [95% CI 69, 96]. A significantly lower incidence was identified in high-income countries.

conclusionThis systematic review established age-specific global hydrocephalus prevalence. While high-income countries had a lower hydrocephalus incidence according to the ICBDSR registry, folate fortification status was not associated with incidence. Our findings may inform future healthcare resource allocation and study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionAge FactorsChildChild HealthEpidemiological MonitoringFolic AcidGlobal HealthHumansHydrocephalusIncidenceInfant HealthPrevalenceFolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID30273390
PMCPMC6166961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.