Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30273337›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Linking signal detection theory and encoding models to reveal independent neural representations from neuroimaging data.

Fabian A Soto, Lauren E Vucovich, F Gregory Ashby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabian A SotoDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-679X
Lauren E VucovichDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
F Gregory AshbyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.

Funding

The Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Category LearningR01MH063760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ASHBY, F. GREGORY, HELIE, SEBASTIEN · 2002 to 2018
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many research questions in visual perception involve determining whether stimulus properties are represented and processed independently. In visual neuroscience, there is great interest in determining whether important object dimensions are represented independently in the brain. For example, theories of face recognition have proposed either completely or partially independent processing of identity and emotional expression. Unfortunately, most previous research has only vaguely defined what is meant by "independence," which hinders its precise quantification and testing. This article develops a new quantitative framework that links signal detection theory from psychophysics and encoding models from computational neuroscience, focusing on a special form of independence defined in the psychophysics literature: perceptual separability. The new theory allowed us, for the first time, to precisely define separability of neural representations and to theoretically link behavioral and brain measures of separability. The framework formally specifies the relation between these different levels of perceptual and brain representation, providing the tools for a truly integrative research approach. In particular, the theory identifies exactly what valid inferences can be made about independent encoding of stimulus dimensions from the results of multivariate analyses of neuroimaging data and psychophysical studies. In addition, commonly used operational tests of independence are re-interpreted within this new theoretical framework, providing insights on their correct use and interpretation. Finally, we apply this new framework to the study of separability of brain representations of face identity and emotional expression (neutral/sad) in a human fMRI study with male and female participants.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainFaceFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID30273337
PMCPMC6181430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.