ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2019
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.European urology oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy ofThe British journal of radiology · 2019Pooled it
- What should be the future direction of development in the field of prostate cancer with lung metastasis?World journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- StagingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 76 patients who underwent
resultsTwenty-two (29%) PET/CT scans were positive, 49 (64%) negative, and five (7%) equivocal for nodal or metastatic disease. Of the positive scans, 17 showed regional lymph node involvement, 12 distant nodes, five bone metastases, and three lung metastases. Overall per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for metastatic disease were 65%, 100%, 100%, and 78%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 64%, 100%, 100%, and 80%, respectively, for nodal involvement and 86%, 100%, 100%, and 98%, respectively, for bone and other metastases. Conventional imaging was negative for the lesion(s) found on PET/CT in five patients. PET/CT changed the clinical management in nine patients (12%).
conclusionsAlthough
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.