Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30272998›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019

Imaging tumour hypoxia with oxygen-enhanced MRI and BOLD MRI.

James P B O'Connor, Simon P Robinson, John C Waterton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Use of Radiomics in Characterizing Tumor Hypoxia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James P B O'Connor1 Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
Simon P Robinson3 Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research , London , UK.
John C Waterton4 Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15267Cancer Research UK 22746Cancer Research UK 27725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia is known to be a poor prognostic indicator for nearly all solid tumours and also is predictive of treatment failure for radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery and targeted therapies. Imaging has potential to identify, spatially map and quantify tumour hypoxia prior to therapy, as well as track changes in hypoxia on treatment. At present no hypoxia imaging methods are available for routine clinical use. Research has largely focused on positron emission tomography (PET)-based techniques, but there is gathering evidence that MRI techniques may provide a practical and more readily translational alternative. In this review we focus on the potential for imaging hypoxia by measuring changes in longitudinal relaxation [R

Indexed as

Tumor HypoxiaBiomarkersContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsOxygenBiomarkersContrast MediaOxygen

Identifiers

PMID30272998
PMCPMC6540855
OpenAlexW2895728006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.