Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30272679›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A.

Yuan Zong, Qianna Song, Chao Li, Shuai Jin, Dingbo Zhang, Yanpeng Wang, Jin-Long Qiu, Caixia Gao

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 182 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 444 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Programmable ZBTB7A RNA NMolecular cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Genomic diversity at thePlant diversity · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Its Applications in Cereal Crop Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Advances and Applications of Plant Base Editing Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Control of seed-to-seedling transition by an upstream open reading frame inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuan ZongState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qianna SongState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chao LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuai JinState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dingbo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanpeng WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jin-Long QiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-2552
Caixia GaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-8248
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Base editors (BEs) have been used to create C-to-T substitutions in various organisms. However, editing with rat APOBEC1-based BE3 is limited to a 5-nt sequence editing window and is inefficient in GC contexts. Here, we show that a base editor fusion protein composed of Cas9 nickase and human APOBEC3A (A3A-PBE) converts cytidine to thymidine efficiently in wheat, rice and potato with a 17-nucleotide editing window at all examined sites, independent of sequence context.

Identifiers

PMID30272679
OpenAlexW2893791662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.