Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30272391›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2019

Establishing the Genomic Knowledge Matrix for Nursing Science.

Mary Regan, Mary B Engler, Bernice Coleman, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Kathleen A Calzone

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of the Integration of Genetics and Genomics Into Nursing Practice.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Establishing the Omics Nursing Science & Education Network.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2020
    Article
  14. Precision health: A nursing perspective.International journal of nursing sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary ReganChi, Associate Professor, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mary B EnglerProfessor, Uniformed Sciences University of the Health Sciences, Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing, Bethesda, MD, USA; Former Chief, Vascular Biology Unit, Training Director, National Institutes of Health, NINR, Division of Intramural Research, Bethesda, MD, USA; Professor Emeritus, Director of Cardiovascular and Genomics Graduate Programs, University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, Department of Physiological Nursing, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bernice ColemanDelta Mu, Assistant Professor, Biomedical Sciences, Nurse Researcher, Nurse Practitioner, Associate Director, Nursing Research Department, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sandra Daack-HirschGamma, Associate Professor, PhD Program Director, The University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Kathleen A CalzoneXi, Research Geneticist, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Genomic Competency InitiativeZIEBC011912 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CALZONE, KATHLEEN · 2019 to 2025
$703k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish the knowledge needed to integrate the multiple branches of omics into nursing research to accelerate achieving the research recommendations of the Genomic Nursing Science Blueprint.

methodsThe creation of the Genomic Knowledge Matrix occurred in three phases. In phase 1, the Omics Nursing Science and Education Network (ONSEN) Education Workgroup completed an evidence, bioinformatics, and technology review to inform the components of the Matrix. The ONSEN Advisory Panel then reviewed and integrated revisions. Phase 3 solicited targeted public comment focused on education and research experts, and applicable revisions were made.

findingsThe Genomic Knowledge Matrix establishes the following content areas: cellular and molecular biology, system physiology, microbiology, and translational bioinformatics as the minimum required preparation for nurse scientists to understand omics and to integrate this knowledge into research. The Matrix also establishes levels of understanding needed to function based on the role of the nurse scientist.

conclusionsThe Genomic Knowledge Matrix addresses knowledge important for nurse scientists to integrate genomics into their research. Building on prior recommendations and existing genomic competencies, the Matrix was designed to present key knowledge elements critical to understand omics that underpin health and disease. Knowledge depth varies based on the research role. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Genomic Knowledge Matrix provides the vital guidance for training nurse scientists in the integration of genomics. The flexibility of the Matrix also provides guidance to inform fundamental genomic content needed in core science content in undergraduate and graduate level nursing curricula.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceComputational BiologyCurriculumEducation, NursingGenomicsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.)National Institute of Nursing Research (U.S.)NursesNursing Education ResearchUnited StatesCompetencyeducationgeneticsgenomicsknowledgenursingresearch

Identifiers

PMID30272391
PMCPMC6329656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.