Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2018
Unobserved automated office BP is similar to other clinic BP measurements: A prospective randomized study.
Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Revisiting Unattended Versus Attended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Attended Versus Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019Pooled it
- A meta-analysis helps to clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Pooled it
- Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of unattended, attended and routine clinic systolic blood pressure measurements and determinants of blood pressure difference between attended and unattended BP.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Trial
- Unobserved automated office BP is similar to other clinic BP measurements: A prospective randomized study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Trial
- Are Unattended Blood Pressure Measurements Necessary in All Patients Visiting an Outpatient Cardiology Clinic?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020Article
- The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Review
- Association Between Early Hypertension Control and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Veterans With Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2019Article
- Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.Current hypertension reports · 2019Review
- A meta-analysis that helps clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
- The clinical value of automated office blood pressure: What is the latest evidence on attended vs unattended automated readings in clinical practice?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Results of the SPRINT study have been disputed, based on the assumption that unattended BP measurements do not correlate with usual BP measurements. In this study, the authors investigated the correlation of unattended SPRINT-like measurements with other conventional measurements. All BP measurements were taken with the patient seated in a comfortable chair with the legs uncrossed and not speaking during the procedure. For the purpose of this study, sixty-five patients, mostly male (93%), were recruited from our hypertension clinic and all were on antihypertensive medication (av 3.0 ± 1.1). Patients were at high cardiovascular risk with high rates of comorbidities, av age 68 ± 12 years, 49% with diabetes, 34% with mild CKD (CKD 1-3, average eGFR 55.0 ± 13 mL/min/1.73 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.