Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30272276›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2018

Cytocidal effects of arenobufagin and hellebrigenin, two active bufadienolide compounds, against human glioblastoma cell line U-87.

Lingyu Han, Bo Yuan, Ryota Shimada, Hideki Hayashi, Nan Si, Hai-Yu Zhao, Baolin Bian, Norio Takagi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lingyu HanDepartment of Applied Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan.
Bo YuanDepartment of Applied Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan.
Ryota ShimadaDepartment of Applied Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan.
Hideki HayashiDepartment of Applied Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan.
Nan SiInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P.R. China.
Hai-Yu ZhaoInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P.R. China.
Baolin BianInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P.R. China.
Norio TakagiDepartment of Applied Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan.
Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences · JPChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal intracranial tumor type, characterized by high angiogenic and infiltrative capacities. To provide a novel insight into therapeutic strategies against glioblastoma, the cytotoxicity of arenobufagin and hellebrigenin was investigated in the human glioblastoma cell line, U-87. Similar dose-dependent cytotoxicity was observed in the cells, whereas no detectable toxicity was confirmed in mouse primary astrocytes. Treatment with each drug downregulated the expression levels of Cdc25C, Cyclin B1 and survivin, which occurred in parallel with G2/M phase arrest. Necrotic-like cell death was only observed in the cells treated with a relatively high concentration (>100 ng/ml). These results indicate that the two drugs exhibited distinct cytotoxicity against cancerous glial cells with high potency and selectivity, suggesting that growth inhibition associated with G2/M phase arrest and/or necrosis were attributed to their toxicities. Activation of the p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway was also observed in treated cells. Notably, a specific inhibitor of p38 MAPK, SB203580, itself caused a significant decrease in cell viability, and further enhanced the cytotoxicity of the two drugs, suggesting an important pro-survival role for p38 MAPK. Given that p38 MAPK serves an essential role in promoting glioblastoma cell survival, developing a novel combination regimen of arenobufagin/hellebrigenin plus a p38 MAPK inhibitor may improve the efficacy of the two drugs, and may provide more therapeutic benefits to patients with glioblastoma. The qualitative assessment demonstrated the existence of arenobufagin in the cerebrospinal fluid of arenobufagin-treated rats, supporting its clinical application.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsBufanolidescdc25 PhosphatasesCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCyclin B1Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansImidazolesAntineoplastic AgentsarenobufaginBIRC5 protein, humanBufanolidesCCNB1 protein, humanCDC25C protein, humancdc25 PhosphatasesCyclin B1hellebrigeninImidazolesPyridinesSB 203580Survivin

Identifiers

PMID30272276
PMCPMC6203163
OpenAlexW2892009123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.