Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30272228›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2018

The response of ruminal fermentation, epithelium-associated microbiota, and epithelial barrier function to severe feed restriction in pregnant ewes.

Fan Hu, Yanfeng Xue, Changzheng Guo, Junhua Liu, Shengyong Mao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thymol modulates rumen barrier function and inflammation in feed-restricted lambs.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of Replacing Whole-Crop Maize Silage withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dietary PostbioticAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fan HuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yanfeng XueJiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Changzheng GuoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Junhua LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Shengyong MaoJiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in the ruminal fermentation, epithelium-associated microbiota, and ruminal epithelial barrier function in response to severe feed restriction (SFR) in pregnant ewes. Sixteen pregnant ewes (108 d of gestation) were randomly blocked and assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: control (CON, n = 8) and SFR (n = 8). Ewes were fed a common diet with a 60:40 forage to concentrate ratio for 7-d baseline period followed by a SFR challenge period. Ewes on the SFR treatment were restricted to 30% of the base for 15 d. At the end of the experimental period, all animals were slaughtered and then ruminal contents and ruminal epithelial tissue were collected. Results showed that ruminal pH was greater in SFR group (P = 0.040) compared with CON group, while SFR decreased (P < 0.05) the concentrations of ruminal acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total volatile fatty acid. A plot of principal coordinate analysis and analysis of molecular variance revealed that the composition of ruminal epithelial bacterial communities in the CON group was distinct from that of the ruminal epithelial microbiome in the SFR animals. At the genus level, SFR increased the abundance of unclassified Neisseriaceae, Comamonas, and Papillibacter, and decreased the proportion of Howardella, Desulfobulbus, and Suttonella (P < 0.05) compared with CON group. The metagenome of ruminal epithelium-associated microbiota predicted by PICRUSt revealed that the SFR significantly affected 14 metabolic pathways, and 9 were significantly enriched in the SFR group. In particular, SFR markedly increased relative abundances of dominant gene families involved in amino acid metabolism (P = 0.003), cellular processes and signaling (P = 0.021), and lipid metabolism (P = 0.001). The real-time PCR results showed SFR decreased the mRNA expression of IL-10 (P = 0.003) and upregulated the mRNA expression of IL-6 (P = 0.003) and TLR4 (P = 0.021). The mRNA expression of Claudin-1 (P = 0.001) and ZO-1 (P = 0.009) were lower in the SFR group compared with the CON group. Generally, our data suggest that SFR decreased most ruminal fermentation parameters, altered the composition of rumen epithelium-associated microbiota, and compromised the barrier function of rumen epithelium. These findings are of great importance for understanding the alteration in the rumen function following SFR in pregnant ewes.

Indexed as

Food DeprivationMicrobiotaAnimal FeedAnimalsButyratesDietEpitheliumFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleFermentationPregnancyPropionatesRandom AllocationRumenSheepButyratesFatty Acids, VolatilePropionates

Identifiers

PMID30272228
PMCPMC6162573
OpenAlexW2885285943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.