ArticleJournal of animal science2018
The response of ruminal fermentation, epithelium-associated microbiota, and epithelial barrier function to severe feed restriction in pregnant ewes.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thymol modulates rumen barrier function and inflammation in feed-restricted lambs.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026Article
- Nutritional restriction during late gestation disrupts placental transcriptional programs related to metabolism, transport, and immune function in a sheep model.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Effects of Replacing Whole-Crop Maize Silage withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Glutamine alleviates feed restriction-induced barrier function injury in yak rumen epithelium.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026Article
- Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Rumen microbiome and fat deposition in sheep: insights from a bidirectional mendelian randomization study.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024Article
- Effect of thymol on the efficiency of feed utilization and compensatory growth in severe feed-restricted lambs.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
- Effects of Dietary Energy Levels on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Barrier and Microflora in Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Pregnancy Toxemia in Ewes: A Review of Molecular Metabolic Mechanisms and Management Strategies.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Dietary spirulina supplementation modifies rumen development, fermentation and bacteria composition in Hu sheep when consuming high-fat dietary.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Effects of Post-Ruminal Urea Supplementation during the Seasonal Period on Performance and Rumen Microbiome of Rearing Grazing Nellore Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Physiologic Effects of Prolonged Terminal Anesthesia in Sheep (Comparative medicine · 2022Article
- Effects of whole maize high-grain diet feeding on colonic fermentation and bacterial community in weaned lambs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Late Gestation Maternal Feed Restriction Decreases Microbial Diversity of the Placenta While Mineral Supplementation Improves Richness of the Fetal Gut Microbiome in Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Changes in Digestive Microbiota, Rumen Fermentations and Oxidative Stress around Parturition Are Alleviated by Live Yeast Feed Supplementation to Gestating Ewes.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effects of Dietary Energy Levels on Rumen Fermentation, Gastrointestinal Tract Histology, and Bacterial Community Diversity in Fattening Male Hu Lambs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Disruption of ruminal homeostasis by malnutrition involved in systemic ruminal microbiota-host interactions in a pregnant sheep model.Microbiome · 2020Article
- Undernutrition shifted colonic fermentation and digest-associated bacterial communities in pregnant ewes.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Dietary PostbioticAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in the ruminal fermentation, epithelium-associated microbiota, and ruminal epithelial barrier function in response to severe feed restriction (SFR) in pregnant ewes. Sixteen pregnant ewes (108 d of gestation) were randomly blocked and assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: control (CON, n = 8) and SFR (n = 8). Ewes were fed a common diet with a 60:40 forage to concentrate ratio for 7-d baseline period followed by a SFR challenge period. Ewes on the SFR treatment were restricted to 30% of the base for 15 d. At the end of the experimental period, all animals were slaughtered and then ruminal contents and ruminal epithelial tissue were collected. Results showed that ruminal pH was greater in SFR group (P = 0.040) compared with CON group, while SFR decreased (P < 0.05) the concentrations of ruminal acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total volatile fatty acid. A plot of principal coordinate analysis and analysis of molecular variance revealed that the composition of ruminal epithelial bacterial communities in the CON group was distinct from that of the ruminal epithelial microbiome in the SFR animals. At the genus level, SFR increased the abundance of unclassified Neisseriaceae, Comamonas, and Papillibacter, and decreased the proportion of Howardella, Desulfobulbus, and Suttonella (P < 0.05) compared with CON group. The metagenome of ruminal epithelium-associated microbiota predicted by PICRUSt revealed that the SFR significantly affected 14 metabolic pathways, and 9 were significantly enriched in the SFR group. In particular, SFR markedly increased relative abundances of dominant gene families involved in amino acid metabolism (P = 0.003), cellular processes and signaling (P = 0.021), and lipid metabolism (P = 0.001). The real-time PCR results showed SFR decreased the mRNA expression of IL-10 (P = 0.003) and upregulated the mRNA expression of IL-6 (P = 0.003) and TLR4 (P = 0.021). The mRNA expression of Claudin-1 (P = 0.001) and ZO-1 (P = 0.009) were lower in the SFR group compared with the CON group. Generally, our data suggest that SFR decreased most ruminal fermentation parameters, altered the composition of rumen epithelium-associated microbiota, and compromised the barrier function of rumen epithelium. These findings are of great importance for understanding the alteration in the rumen function following SFR in pregnant ewes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.