ArticleHealth promotion international2019
Cash transfers and the social determinants of health: a conceptual framework.
Article in Health promotion international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Long-term association of a conditional cash transfer programme and maternal mortality in Ecuador: An ecological longitudinal study, 2010-2023.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- Pilot randomized trial of cash transfer interventions to improve health outcomes in low income adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: Study protocol and baseline characteristics.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Health effects of the Brazilian Conditional Cash Transfer programme over 20 years and projections to 2030: a retrospective analysis and modelling study.The Lancet. Public health · 2025Article
- More Money, More Questions: How Caregivers Spent the Expanded Child Tax Credit.Children and youth services review · 2025Article
- Exploring health equity in Lesotho's Child Grants Programme.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- An Unconditional Cash Transfer Program for Low-Income New Yorkers Affected by COVID-19.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of Brazil's Bolsa Família Programme on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a natural experiment study using the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort.International journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Transportation and other social needs as markers of mental health conditions.Journal of transport & health · 2022Article
- The impact of unconditional cash transfers on morbidity and health-seeking behaviour in Africa: evidence from Ghana, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe.Health policy and planning · 2022Article
- Informing decisions with disparate stakeholders: cross-sector evaluation of cash transfers in Malawi.Health policy and planning · 2022Article
- Multi-purpose cash transfers and health among vulnerable Syrian refugees in Jordan: A prospective cohort study.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Unvaccinated children as community parasites in National Qualitative Study from Turkey.BMC public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cash transfers (CTs) can play a significant role in tackling the social determinants of health (SDoH), but to date there is a lack of conceptual framework for understanding CTs linkages to the SDoH. This article proposes a framework that identifies the linkages between CTs and SDoH, discusses its implications, and argues for active involvement of health promoters in CT design, implementation and evaluation. The development of the framework followed two stages: evidence review and stakeholder involvement. The evidence review entailed a systematic literature search to identify published and unpublished impact evaluation studies of CTs in sub-Saharan Africa. Critical reflection on the evidence synthesized from the literature formed the basis for the development of the framework. Interviews with CT policy makers, managers and development partners were also carried out to help refine the framework. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcripts were analysed using thematic framework analysis. The study finds that there is limited recognition of SDoH in CT policy making and implementation. The evidence reviewed, however, points to strong impacts of CTs on SDoH. The framework thus conceptualizes how CTs work to influence a broad range of SDoH and health inequities. It also highlights how CT architecture and contexts may influence program impacts. The proposed framework can be used by policy makers to guide CT design, adaptation and operations, and by program managers and researchers to inform CTs' evaluations, respectively. The framework suggests that to optimize CT impact on SDoH and reduce health inequities, health promoters should be actively engaged in terms of the programs design, implementation and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.