Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271925›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2018

Light-activated cell identification and sorting (LACIS) for selection of edited clones on a nanofluidic device.

Annamaria Mocciaro, Theodore L Roth, Hayley M Bennett, Magali Soumillon, Abhik Shah, Joseph Hiatt, Kevin Chapman, Alexander Marson, Gregory Lavieu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. eLife · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. High-throughput selection of cells based on accumulated growth and division using PicoShell particles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annamaria MocciaroBerkeley Lights, Inc, 5858 Horton Street #320, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.
Theodore L RothUCSF Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3970-9573
Hayley M BennettBerkeley Lights, Inc, 5858 Horton Street #320, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.
Magali SoumillonBerkeley Lights, Inc, 5858 Horton Street #320, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.
Abhik ShahBerkeley Lights, Inc, 5858 Horton Street #320, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.
Joseph HiattUCSF Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-9614
Kevin ChapmanBerkeley Lights, Inc, 5858 Horton Street #320, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.
Alexander MarsonUCSF Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Alexander.Marson@UCSF.edu.
Gregory LavieuBerkeley Lights, Inc, 5858 Horton Street #320, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA. Gregory.lavieu@curie.fr.
University of California, San Francisco · USInserm · FR

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDERSON, MARK S · 1985 to 2020
$29.6M
Research BaseP30DK063720 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VAISSE, CHRISTIAN · 2003 to 2019
$21.8M
DIABETES, ENDOCRINOLOGY &METABOLISM TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007418 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EDWARD C HSIAO · 1986 to 2026
$14.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063720NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007418NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improvements in the CRISPR molecular toolbox, identifying and purifying properly edited clones remains slow, laborious, and low-yield. Here, we establish a method to enable clonal isolation, selection, and expansion of properly edited cells, using OptoElectroPositioning technology for single-cell manipulation on a nanofluidic device. Briefly, after electroporation of primary T cells with

Identifiers

PMID30271925
PMCPMC6123811
OpenAlexW2802564172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.