ArticleRegenerative therapy2018
Electron microscopic observation of human auricular chondrocytes transplanted into peritoneal cavity of nude mice for cartilage regeneration.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unconventional auricular reconstruction using controlled scaffold buckling and chondrogenic cocktail containing muscle-derived cells.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Investigation of cartilage modification for controlling immune reaction against xenogeneic cartilage.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Requirement of direct contact between chondrocytes and macrophages for the maturation of regenerative cartilage.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Biological aspects of tissue-engineered cartilage.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restoration of damaged cartilage tissue has been deemed futile with current treatments. Although there have been many studies on cartilage regeneration thus far, there is no report that chondrocytes were completely re-differentiated in vitro. The clarification of cellular composition and matrix production during cartilage regeneration must be elucidated to fabricate viable mature cartilage in vitro. In order to achieve this aim, the chondrocytes cultured on coverslips were transplanted into the peritoneal cavities of mice. At different time points post-transplantation, the cartilage maturation progression and cells composing the regeneration were examined. Cartilage regeneration was confirmed by hematoxylin & eosin (HE) and toluidine blue staining. The maturation progression was carefully examined further by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). At the first and second week time points, various cell shapes were observed using SEM. Chronologically, by the third week, the number of fibers increased, suggesting the progression of extracellular matrix (ECM) maturation. Observation through TEM revealed the chondrocytes located in close proximity to various cells including macrophage-like cells. On the second week, infiltration of lymphocytes and capillary vessels were observed, and after the third week, the chondrocytes had matured and were abundantly releasing extracellular matrix. Chronological observation of transplanted chondrocytes by electron microscopy revealed maturation of chondrocytes and accumulation of matrix during the re-differentiation process. Emerging patterns of host-derived cells such as macrophage-like cells and subsequent appearance of lymphocytes-like cells and angiogenesis were documented, providing crucial context for the identification of the cells responsible for in vivo cartilage regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.