Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271831›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2018

Affect and Cognition: Three Principles.

Gerald L Clore, Alexander J Schiller, Adi Shaked

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Arousal may not be anything to get excited about.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Chronic Burden Across Multiple Domains and Experiences of Daily Stressors on Negative Affect.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gerald L CloreUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA.
Alexander J SchillerUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA.
Adi ShakedUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA.

Funding

COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF EMOTIONR01MH050074 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI CLORE, GERALD L · 1994 to 2011
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affect and its object are separable, so that the same affective reaction can have different effects. Relevant principles from the affect-as-information approach include: (1) The impact of affect depends on implicit attributions -- what it appears to be about. (2) Affect is always taken to be about whatever is currently mentally accessible. Affective reactions can therefore serve as appraisals of objects of judgment or of initial thoughts and opinions about such objects, when they are more accessible. During problem solving, affect can serve as appraisals of thought style rather than thought content. Then, (3) positive and negative affect serve as go and stop signals for current inclinations. Affective influences on cognition are therefore not fixed, but malleable and context-dependent.

Identifiers

PMID30271831
PMCPMC6159898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.