ArticleInternational public health journal
Who Do Smokers Feel Ought to Be Responsible for Informing People about the Dangers Associated with Smoking and Regulating Smoking Behaviors?
Article in International public health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe focus of this paper is to examine the extent to which a community-based sample of current cigarette smokers believes it to be the responsibility of outside persons and agencies to inform the public about the dangers of smoking and/or to regulate smoking behaviors (herein termed REGULATE). Also investigated is how REGULATE relates to smokers' attitudes toward cigarette smoking and actual smoking practices, and whether REGULATE matters when the influence of other key variables is taken into account.
methodQuestionnaire-based interviews were conducted with a community-based sample of 485 adult current cigarette smokers recruited from the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. Active and passive recruiting approaches were used, along with a targeted sampling strategy.
resultsParticipants were divided in their beliefs pertaining to REGULATE. Their beliefs were related consistently to smoking-related attitudes but much less to actual smoking behaviors. Four factors (greater religiosity, older age of first purchasing a cigarette, lower levels of depression, and sexual abuse history) were found to underlie REGULATE. Structural equation analysis revealed that REGULATE is an influential measure to consider when trying to understand overall attitudes toward smoking and actual smoking behaviors.
conclusionREGULATE is an important variable to consider when aiming to understand the factors associated with how people feel about their smoking practices, including actual cigarette use. It may be construed as a proxy measure for locus of control; and the implications of this are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30271530PMC6157742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.