ArticleBiomicrofluidics2018
An integrated microfluidic platform for size-selective single-cell trapping of monocytes from blood.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- A Review of Advanced Impedance Biosensors with Microfluidic Chips for Single-Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Fully Automated, Sample-to-Answer Leukocyte Functional Assessment Platform for Continuous Sepsis Monitoring via Microliters of Blood.ACS sensors · 2021Article
- Microscale nonlinear electrokinetics for the analysis of cellular materials in clinical applications: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
- Chemical Analysis of Single Cells and Organelles.Analytical chemistry · 2021Review
- The promise of single-cell mechanophenotyping for clinical applications.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Label-free enrichment of fate-biased human neural stem and progenitor cells.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020Article
- High-throughput continuous dielectrophoretic separation of neural stem cells.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable separation and isolation of target single cells from bodily fluids with high purity is of great significance for an accurate and quantitative understanding of the cellular heterogeneity. Here, we describe a fully integrated single-blood-cell analysis platform capable of size-selective cell separation from a population containing a wide distribution of sizes such as diluted blood sample and highly efficient entrapment of single monocytes. The spiked single U937 cells (human monocyte cell line) are separated in sequence by two different-sized microfilters for removing large cell clumps, white blood cells, and red blood cells and then discriminated by dielectrophoretic force and isolated individually by downstream single-cell trapping arrays. When 2% hematocrit blood cells with a final ratio of 1:1000 U937 cells were introduced under the flow rate of 0.2 ml/h, 400 U937 cells were trapped sequentially and deterministically within 40 s with single-cell occupancy of up to 85%. As a proof-of-concept, we also demonstrated single monocyte isolation from diluted blood using the integrated microfluidic device. This size-selective, label-free, and live-cell enrichment microfluidic single blood-cell isolation platform for the processing of cancer and blood cells has a myriad of applications in areas such as single-cell genetic analysis, stem cell biology, point-of-care diagnostics, and cancer diagnostics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.