Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271452›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2018

Antidiabetic Activities of Hydromethanolic Leaf Extract of

Yaschilal Muche Belayneh, Eshetie Melese Birru

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemical Profiling and Molecular Docking Study ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hypoglycemic, Antihyperglycemic, and Toxic Effects ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  12. Antidiabetic Activity of Hydromethanolic Extract of CrudeJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of Antidiabetic and Antihyperlipidemic Activity of 80% Methanolic Extract of the Root ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  15. Antidiarrheal and Antibacterial Activities ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  16. Metabolism open · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Medicinal Plant Extracts EvaluatedEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of Antidiabetic Activity ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaschilal Muche BelaynehDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, P.O. Box 1145, Dessie, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-7176
Eshetie Melese BirruDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia.
University of Gondar · ETWollo University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is one of the largest global health problems demanding preventive and new therapeutic interventions. Currently, there is a need for safe, effective, and less costly antidiabetic medications, and investigating medicinal plants for new antidiabetic medication is an interesting research area. Thus, the present study was done to evaluate the antidiabetic activities of 80% methanolic leaf extract of

Identifiers

PMID30271452
PMCPMC6151229
OpenAlexW2890392445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.