Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271329›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2018

Auditory Attention Reduced Ear-Canal Noise in Humans by Reducing Subject Motion, Not by Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Inhibition: Implications for Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions During a Behavioral Task.

Nikolas A Francis, Wei Zhao, John J Guinan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolas A FrancisSpeech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Wei ZhaoEaton Peabody Laboratories, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, United States.
John J GuinanSpeech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

TRAINING FOR SPEECH AND HEARING SCIENCEST32DC000038 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gwenaelle S Geleoc · 1992 to 2026
$21.8M
Imaging Core PlanP30DC005209 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI LIBERMAN, M. CHARLES · 2002 to 2016
$12.0M
Olivocochlear Reflex in HumansR01DC005977 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI GUINAN, JOHN J · 2003 to 2013
$2.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005209NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005977NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are often measured to non-invasively determine activation of medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents in humans. Usually these experiments assume that ear-canal noise remains constant. However, changes in ear-canal noise have been reported in some behavioral experiments. We studied the variability of ear-canal noise in eight subjects who performed a two-interval-forced-choice (2IFC) sound-level-discrimination task on monaural tone pips in masker noise. Ear-canal noise was recorded directly from the unstimulated ear opposite the task ear. Recordings were also made with similar sounds presented, but no task done. In task trials, ear-canal noise was reduced at the time the subject did the discrimination, relative to the ear-canal noise level earlier in the trial. In two subjects, there was a decrease in ear-canal noise, primarily at 1-2 kHz, with a time course similar to that expected from inhibition by MOC activity elicited by the task-ear masker noise. These were the only subjects with spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs). We hypothesize that the SOAEs were inhibited by MOC activity elicited by the task-ear masker. Based on the standard rationale in OAE experiments that large bursts of ear-canal noise are artifacts due to subject movement, ear-canal noise bursts above a sound-level criterion were removed. As the criterion was lowered and more high- and moderate-level ear-canal noise bursts were removed, the reduction in ear-canal noise level at the time of the 2IFC discrimination decreased to almost zero, for the six subjects without SOAEs. This pattern is opposite that expected from MOC-induced inhibition (which is greater on lower-level sounds), but can be explained by the hypothesis that subjects move less and create fewer bursts of ear-canal noise when they concentrate on doing the task. In no-task trials for these six subjects, the ear-canal noise level was little changed throughout the trial. Our results show that measurements of MOC effects on OAEs must measure and account for changes in ear-canal noise, especially in behavioral experiments. The results also provide a novel way of showing the time course of the buildup of attention via the time course of the reduction in ear-canal noise.

Indexed as

attentioncochlear amplifierear-canal noiseolivocochlear efferentotoacoustic emissions

Identifiers

PMID30271329
PMCPMC6146202
OpenAlexW2889042080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.