ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2018
Transforming the systematic review service: a team-based model to support the educational needs of researchers.
Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure and elements of library evidence synthesis services: a content analysis of publicly available information.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- Taking it a step farther: acknowledging librarians' systematic review work in the promotion or tenure process.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2023Article
- Systematic review support received and needed by researchers: a survey of libraries supporting Ontario medical schools.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2021Article
- Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To meet the current needs of researchers who perform systematic reviews in health care settings, libraries need to provide high-quality educational services for researchers as part of their systematic review services. A team of librarians with diverse skills is also important for ensuring the growth and sustainability of systematic review services. This commentary describes a new team-based systematic review service model that can transform systematic review services by providing a pathway for librarians to offer a comprehensive educational service for systematic review research in a variety of health sciences library settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.