Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271266›Full record

ArticleHealth, risk & society2017

Social Drinking Groups and Risk Experience in Nightclubs: Latent Class Analysis.

Beth Bourdeau, Brenda A Miller, Robert B Voas, Mark B Johnson, Hilary F Byrnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health, risk & society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Data-Driven Exploratory Analysis of the Alcohol-Harm Paradox in South-East Wales.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beth BourdeauPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Prevention Research Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Brenda A MillerPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Prevention Research Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Robert B VoasPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Mark B JohnsonPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.
Hilary F ByrnesPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Prevention Research Center, Oakland, California, USA.

Funding

Prevention of Young Adult Drug Use in Club SettingsR01DA018770 · NIDA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI MILLER, BRENDA A · 2005 to 2012
$3.9M
Drinking Patterns at Clubs: Using Oral Assays and Portal MethodologyRC1AA019110 · NIAAA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI MILLER, BRENDA A · 2009 to 2010
$997k
NIAAA NIH HHS RC1 AA019110NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nightclubs are a setting in which young adults purposefully seek out experiences, such as drug use and alcohol intoxication that can expose them to physical harm. While physical harm occurs fairly frequently within clubs, many patrons have safe clubbing experiences. Further, not all patrons experience potential harms the same way, as there are differences in aggression and intoxication. In this article we draw on data from a research study in which we sought to better understand the role of social drinking groups in experiences of risk within nightclubs, as the majority of patrons attend with others. We collected data from 1,642 patrons comprising 615 social drinking groups as they entered and exited nightclubs in a major U.S. city. We focused on six experiences that might cause physical harm: alcohol impairment, alcohol intoxication, drug use, physical aggression, sexual aggression, and impaired driving. We aggregated patron responses across social groups and used latent class statistical analysis to determine if and how experiences tended to co-occur within groups. This analysis indicated there were five distinct classes which we named Limited Vulnerability, Aggression Vulnerability, Substance Users, Impaired Drivers and Multi-Issue. We assessed the groups within each class for distinctions on characteristics and group context. We found differences in the groups in each class, such as groups containing romantic dyads experienced less risk, while those groups with greater familiarity, greater concern for safety, and higher expectations for consumption experienced more risk. Group composition has an impact on the experiences within a club on a given night, in particular when it comes to risk and safety assessment.

Indexed as

aggressionalcoholConcurrent riskdrugsriskyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID30271266
PMCPMC6156006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.