Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271205›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

Low tumor purity is associated with poor prognosis, heavy mutation burden, and intense immune phenotype in colon cancer.

Yihao Mao, Qingyang Feng, Peng Zheng, Liangliang Yang, Tianyu Liu, Yuqiu Xu, Dexiang Zhu, Wenju Chang, Meiling Ji, Li Ren and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yihao MaoDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Qingyang FengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Peng ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Liangliang YangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Tianyu LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Yuqiu XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Dexiang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Wenju ChangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Meiling JiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Li RenDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Ye WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Guodong HeDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Jianmin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China, xujmin@aliyun.com, he.guodong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumor purity is defined as the proportion of cancer cells in the tumor tissue. The impact of tumor purity on colon cancer (CC) prognosis, genetic profile, and microenvironment has not been thoroughly accessed. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical and transcriptomic data from three public datasets, GSE17536/17537, GSE39582, and TCGA, were retrospectively collected (n=1,248). Tumor purity of each sample was inferred by a computational method based on transcriptomic data. Survival-related analyses were performed on microarray dataset containing GSE17536/17537 and GSE39582 (n=794), whereas TCGA dataset was utilized for subsequent genomic analysis (n=454).

resultsRight-sided CC patients showed a significantly lower tumor purity. Low purity CC conferred worse survival, and tumor purity was identified as an independent prognostic factor. Moreover, high tumor purity CC patients benefited more from adjuvant chemotherapy. Subsequent genomic analysis found that the mutation burden was negatively associated with tumor purity, with only

conclusionTumor purity exhibited potential value for CC prognostic stratification as well as adjuvant chemotherapy benefit prediction. The relative worse survival in low purity CC may attribute to higher mutation frequency in key pathways and purity-related microenvironmental changing.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapycolon cancerprognosistumor microenvironmenttumor purity

Identifiers

PMID30271205
PMCPMC6149864
OpenAlexW2889958303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.