Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271191›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2018

Duloxetine in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in Japan: a randomized, doubleblind, noninferiority comparative study with pregabalin.

Hiroyuki Enomoto, Hitoshi Yasuda, Atsushi Nishiyori, Shinji Fujikoshi, Masashi Furukawa, Mitsuhiro Ishida, Masashi Takahashi, Toshinaga Tsuji, Aki Yoshikawa, Levent Alev

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02417935 (A Japan Post-Marketing, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Flexible Dose Comparative Study to Assess the Non-Inferiority of Duloxetine Compared With Pregabalin in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02417935 phase4completednot on this map

A Japan Post-Marketing, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Flexible Dose Comparative Study to Assess the Non-Inferiority of Duloxetine Compared With Pregabalin in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2015 to 2017Enrolled304ConditionsDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainArmsDuloxetine, Pregabalin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pain management · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hiroyuki EnomotoBio-Medicine, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan K. K, Tokyo, Japan, enomoto_hiroyuki@lilly.com.
Hitoshi YasudaFoundation of Shiga Health Research Center, Shiga, Japan.
Atsushi NishiyoriProject Management, Global Development Division, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Shinji FujikoshiStatistical Science, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan.
Masashi FurukawaBiostatistics, Biostatistics Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuhiro IshidaClinical Research Development, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Masashi TakahashiBio-Medicine, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan K. K, Tokyo, Japan, enomoto_hiroyuki@lilly.com.
Toshinaga TsujiMedical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Aki YoshikawaScientific Communications, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan K. K, Kobe, Japan.
Levent AlevEli Lilly, Medical Department, Lilly Turkey, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuloxetine and pregabalin are recommended as first-line treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). However, studies have not reported a direct comparison between duloxetine and pregabalin. We conducted a postmarketing, randomized, double-blind study to assess the noninferiority of duloxetine compared with pregabalin after 12 weeks of treatment in adult patients with DPNP in Japan (NCT02417935). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients (N = 303) with distal symmetrical DPNP were randomized to and were administered duloxetine (40-60 mg/day) or pregabalin (300-600 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score (numeric rating scale [NRS]). Noninferiority of duloxetine compared with pregabalin was assessed with the primary endpoint at week 12. Secondary measures, including night pain and worst pain, Brief Pain Inventory-Severity and Interference rating short form (BPI-SF), Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), health outcome measures (EuroQol 5-Dimension index and VAS), and safety were also assessed.

resultsFor the 24-hour NRS average pain score, the difference between the duloxetine and pregabalin groups was 0.072 (95% CI: - 0.295, 0.439), and the upper bound of the 95% CI (0.439) did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin (0.51), at the end of the study period. For secondary outcome measures (night pain, worst pain, BPI-SF, CGI-I, PGI-I, NPSI) and health outcome measures, both the duloxetine and pregabalin treatment groups showed an improvement from baseline with no significant between-group difference. Duloxetine and pregabalin were well tolerated and the safety profiles were consistent with previously reported results.

conclusionThis study demonstrated the noninferior efficacy of duloxetine compared with pregabalin in the treatment of adult patients with DPNP. The safety analyses showed an acceptable tolerability based on safety profiles of duloxetine and pregabalin.

Indexed as

diabetic peripheral neuropathic painduloxetineJapannoninferioritypregabalinserotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID30271191
PMCPMC6145353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.