Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271169›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018

Evaluation of supportive and barrier-protective skin care products in the daily prevention and treatment of cutaneous toxicity during systemic chemotherapy.

Diana Lüftner, Veronica Dell'Acqua, Frédéric Selle, Ahmed Khalil, Maria Cristina Leonardi, Alejandro De La Torre Tomás, George Shenouda, Jesus Romero Fernandez, Roberto Orecchia, Dominique Moyal and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Supportive oncodermatology-a narrative review of its utility and the way forward.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diana LüftnerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Veronica Dell'AcquaDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Frédéric SelleTenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Ahmed KhalilTenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Maria Cristina LeonardiDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alejandro De La Torre TomásPuerta de Hierro Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
George ShenoudaMcGill Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Jesus Romero FernandezPuerta de Hierro Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto OrecchiaDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Dominique MoyalLa Roche-Posay Dermatological Laboratory, Levallois-Perret, France, sophie.seite@loreal.com.
Sophie SeitéLa Roche-Posay Dermatological Laboratory, Levallois-Perret, France, sophie.seite@loreal.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this multicenter, prospective, observational, open-label study was to evaluate the use and tolerability of dermo-cosmetic products in preventing skin reactions associated with cancer treatments. PATIENTS AND

methodsA 12-product kit was supplied to patients before chemotherapy began and was to be used throughout the treatment phase. Cutaneous adverse events were evaluated at each treatment session. Physicians evaluated skin reactions (edema, erythema, dryness, desquamation, pigmentation disorders, and cracks) and gave their opinion on the skin benefit for patients at the end of the study. Patients also evaluated the product benefit using the Patient Benefit Index (PBI) questionnaire. Results were analyzed by subgroups of casual and regular users, based on number and frequency of products used.

resultsA total of 147 patients were enrolled in cancer services in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Canada. Mean age was 59 years with 71% being female. Product tolerance on whole body was rated good to excellent for at least 89% of the patients for each product. Aggravated skin reactions during the study were reported more frequently by casual users than regular users (39.5% versus 22%; DISCUSSION: Overall, the 12-product kit was very well tolerated, with regular users reporting benefits more frequently than casual users. Results support international recommendations to use appropriate skin care products to minimize the impact of cutaneous reactions associated with chemotherapy.

Indexed as

dermatological toxicitydermocosmeticpalliative careskin reactionskin side effect

Identifiers

PMID30271169
PMCPMC6149940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.