Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271144›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2018

Multivalent nanosystems: targeting monocytes/macrophages.

Rémy Poupot, Cécile Goursat, Séverine Fruchon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Embracing nanomaterials' interactions with the innate immune system.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rémy PoupotINSERM, U1043, CNRS, U5282, Université de Toulouse, UPS; Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France, severine.fruchon@inserm.fr.
Cécile GoursatINSERM, U1043, CNRS, U5282, Université de Toulouse, UPS; Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France, severine.fruchon@inserm.fr.
Séverine FruchonINSERM, U1043, CNRS, U5282, Université de Toulouse, UPS; Centre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse-Purpan, Toulouse, France, severine.fruchon@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among all the cellular partners involved in inflammatory processes, monocytes and macrophages are the master regulators of inflammation. They are found in almost all the tissues and are nearly the only cells capable of performing each step of inflammation. Consequently, they stand as major relevant therapeutic targets to treat inflammatory disorders and diseases. The physiological phagocytic activity of macrophages prompts them to detect, to recognize, and eventually to engulf any nanosystem cruising in their neighborhood. Interestingly, nanosystems can be rationally engineered to afford multivalent, and multifunctional if needed, entities with multiplexed and/or reinforced biological activities. Indeed, engineered nanosystems bearing moieties specifically targeting macrophages, and loaded with or bound to drugs are promising candidates to modulate, or even eradicate, deleterious macrophages in vivo. In this review we highlight recent articles and concepts of multivalent nanosystems targeting monocytes and macrophages to treat inflammatory disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHumansInflammationMacrophagesMonocytesNanoparticlesAnti-Inflammatory Agentsinflammatory diseasesmonocytes/macrophagesmultivalencynanosystems

Identifiers

PMID30271144
PMCPMC6154704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.